Prospective Comparison of Toxicity and Cosmetic Outcome After Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation With Conformal External Beam Radiotherapy or Single-Entry Multilumen Intracavitary Brachytherapy |
| |
Authors: | Shane R. Stecklein Simona F. Shaitelman Gildy V. Babiera Isabelle Bedrosian Dalliah M. Black Matthew T. Ballo Isadora Arzu Eric A. Strom Valerie K. Reed Tomas Dvorak Benjamin D. Smith Wendy A. Woodward Karen E. Hoffman Pamela J. Schlembach Steve M. Kirsner Christopher L. Nelson Jinzhong Yang William Guerra Elizabeth S. Bloom |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;2. Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee;4. Department of Radiation Oncology, UFHealth Cancer Center/Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida;5. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;6. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas |
| |
Abstract: | PurposeThis study aimed to prospectively characterize toxicity and cosmesis after accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (CRT) or single-entry, multilumen, intracavitary brachytherapy.Methods and materialsA total of 281 patients with pTis, pT1N0, or pT2N0 (≤3.0 cm) breast cancer treated with segmental mastectomy were prospectively enrolled from December 2008 through August 2014. APBI was delivered using 3-dimensional CRT (n = 29) or with SAVI (n = 176), Contura (n = 56), or MammoSite (n = 20) brachytherapy catheters. Patients were evaluated at protocol-specified intervals, at which time the radiation oncologist scored cosmetic outcome, toxicities, and recurrence status using a standardized template.ResultsThe median follow-up time is 41 months. Grade 1 seroma and fibrosis were more common with brachytherapy than with 3-dimensional CRT (50.4% vs 3.4% for seroma; P < .0001 and 66.3% vs 44.8% for fibrosis; P = .02), but grade 1 edema was more common with 3-dimensional CRT than with brachytherapy (17.2% vs 5.6%; P = .04). Grade 2 to 3 pain was more common with 3-dimensional CRT (17.2% vs 5.2%; P = .03). Actuarial 5-year rates of fair or poor radiation oncologist-reported cosmetic outcome were 9% for 3-dimensional CRT and 24% for brachytherapy (P = .13). Brachytherapy was significantly associated with inferior cosmesis on mixed model analysis (P = .003). Significant predictors of reduced risk of adverse cosmetic outcome after brachytherapy were D0.1cc (skin) ≤102%, minimum skin distance >5.1 mm, dose homogeneity index >0.54, and volume of nonconformance ≤0.89 cc. The 5-year ipsilateral breast recurrence was 4.3% for brachytherapy and 4.2% for 3-dimensional CRT APBI patients (P = .95).ConclusionsBrachytherapy APBI is associated with higher rates of grade 1 fibrosis and seroma than 3-dimensional CRT but lower rates of grade 1 edema and grade 2 to 3 pain than 3-dimensional CRT. Rates of radiation oncologist-reported fair or poor cosmetic outcomes are higher with brachytherapy. We identified dosimetric parameters that predict reduced risk of adverse cosmetic outcome after brachytherapy-based APBI. Ipsilateral breast recurrence was equivalent for brachytherapy and 3-dimensional CRT. |
| |
Keywords: | Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Katy Regional Care Center (Graham KTC1.1062) 1515 Holcombe Blvd. Unit 2050 Houston TX 77030. |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|