首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Prospective Comparison of Toxicity and Cosmetic Outcome After Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation With Conformal External Beam Radiotherapy or Single-Entry Multilumen Intracavitary Brachytherapy
Authors:Shane R. Stecklein  Simona F. Shaitelman  Gildy V. Babiera  Isabelle Bedrosian  Dalliah M. Black  Matthew T. Ballo  Isadora Arzu  Eric A. Strom  Valerie K. Reed  Tomas Dvorak  Benjamin D. Smith  Wendy A. Woodward  Karen E. Hoffman  Pamela J. Schlembach  Steve M. Kirsner  Christopher L. Nelson  Jinzhong Yang  William Guerra  Elizabeth S. Bloom
Affiliation:1. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;2. Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee;4. Department of Radiation Oncology, UFHealth Cancer Center/Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida;5. Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;6. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Abstract:

Purpose

This study aimed to prospectively characterize toxicity and cosmesis after accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (CRT) or single-entry, multilumen, intracavitary brachytherapy.

Methods and materials

A total of 281 patients with pTis, pT1N0, or pT2N0 (≤3.0 cm) breast cancer treated with segmental mastectomy were prospectively enrolled from December 2008 through August 2014. APBI was delivered using 3-dimensional CRT (n = 29) or with SAVI (n = 176), Contura (n = 56), or MammoSite (n = 20) brachytherapy catheters. Patients were evaluated at protocol-specified intervals, at which time the radiation oncologist scored cosmetic outcome, toxicities, and recurrence status using a standardized template.

Results

The median follow-up time is 41 months. Grade 1 seroma and fibrosis were more common with brachytherapy than with 3-dimensional CRT (50.4% vs 3.4% for seroma; P < .0001 and 66.3% vs 44.8% for fibrosis; P = .02), but grade 1 edema was more common with 3-dimensional CRT than with brachytherapy (17.2% vs 5.6%; P = .04). Grade 2 to 3 pain was more common with 3-dimensional CRT (17.2% vs 5.2%; P = .03). Actuarial 5-year rates of fair or poor radiation oncologist-reported cosmetic outcome were 9% for 3-dimensional CRT and 24% for brachytherapy (P = .13). Brachytherapy was significantly associated with inferior cosmesis on mixed model analysis (P = .003). Significant predictors of reduced risk of adverse cosmetic outcome after brachytherapy were D0.1cc (skin) ≤102%, minimum skin distance >5.1 mm, dose homogeneity index >0.54, and volume of nonconformance ≤0.89 cc. The 5-year ipsilateral breast recurrence was 4.3% for brachytherapy and 4.2% for 3-dimensional CRT APBI patients (P = .95).

Conclusions

Brachytherapy APBI is associated with higher rates of grade 1 fibrosis and seroma than 3-dimensional CRT but lower rates of grade 1 edema and grade 2 to 3 pain than 3-dimensional CRT. Rates of radiation oncologist-reported fair or poor cosmetic outcomes are higher with brachytherapy. We identified dosimetric parameters that predict reduced risk of adverse cosmetic outcome after brachytherapy-based APBI. Ipsilateral breast recurrence was equivalent for brachytherapy and 3-dimensional CRT.
Keywords:Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology   The University of Texas   MD Anderson Cancer Center   Katy Regional Care Center (Graham   KTC1.1062)   1515 Holcombe Blvd.   Unit 2050   Houston   TX 77030.
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号