首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

经额部钻孔冲洗引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿
引用本文:茅明凯,徐美仪,张诚,张保剑,王文林,龙昊. 经额部钻孔冲洗引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿[J]. 安徽医学, 2013, 34(12): 1818-1820
作者姓名:茅明凯  徐美仪  张诚  张保剑  王文林  龙昊
作者单位:马鞍山市十七冶医院神经外科,243000;马鞍山市十七冶医院神经外科,243000;马鞍山市十七冶医院神经外科,243000;马鞍山市十七冶医院神经外科,243000;马鞍山市十七冶医院神经外科,243000;马鞍山市十七冶医院神经外科,243000
摘    要:目的 探讨经额部钻孔冲洗引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的临床疗效与安全性.方法 回顾性分析我院行手术治疗的慢性硬膜外血肿患者80例,根据钻孔方法的不同分为两组:传统的经血肿最厚处钻孔引流组(传统组,48例)、经额部钻孔冲洗引流组(经额组,32例),比较两组患者疗效和并发症的差异.结果 与传统组相比较,经额组的临床疗效显著增加,术后复发率和并发症发生率显著降低.结论经额部钻孔冲洗引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿安全、有效.

关 键 词:慢性硬膜下血肿  钻孔引流  疗效  安全性

Treatment of irrigation and drainage through frontal burr-hole for chronic subdural hematoma
Affiliation:Mao Mingkai, Xu Meiyi, Zhang Cheng, et al Department of Neurosurgery , Maanshan MCCI 7 Hospital ,Maanshan 243000, China
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of irrigation and drainage through frontal burr hole on chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) and its safety. Methods Eighty patients with CSDH were retrospectively reviewed. According to the operative method, all patients were divided into traditionary drainage through thickest part of hematoma (traditionary group, 48 cases) and traditionary drainage through frontal burr hole group ( frontal group, 32 cases). The therapeutic effect and complication were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the traditionary group, the clinical effect in the frontal group was better, and the recurrence rate and the incidence of complications were lower significantly. Conclusion The irrigation and drainage through frontal burr hole is an effective and safe method in the treatment of patients with CSDH.
Keywords:Chronic subdural hematoma  Trepanation and drainage  Therapeutic effect  Safety
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《安徽医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《安徽医学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号