首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

两台化学发光仪检测人生长激素的比对分析及偏倚评估
引用本文:杨方华,邓芳梅,孙丽芳.两台化学发光仪检测人生长激素的比对分析及偏倚评估[J].检验医学与临床,2013(21):2807-2808,2810.
作者姓名:杨方华  邓芳梅  孙丽芳
作者单位:广东省深圳市儿童医院检验科 518026
摘    要:目的对Immulite 1000化学发光仪和DXI 800化学发光仪两种不同检测系统检测人生长激素(hGH)进行方法比对及偏倚评估,探讨不同检测系统间测定结果是否具有可比性。方法依据美国临床和实验室标准化协会(CLSI)EP9-A2文件要求,每天至少收集8份不同浓度的新鲜血清,分别用两种检测系统测定hGH,连续测定至少5d,每个标本均按正反序重复测定,记录测定结果,检查离群点,目测线性及数据分布,计算相关系数和直线回归方程,根据回归方程计算hGH在临界值处的预期偏倚和预期偏倚的95%可信区间并判断偏倚是否可以接受。结果两台仪器检测hGH的相关系数r=0.999,均值差异呈负偏倚,但这种偏差均在允许的误差范围内,临床均可接受。结论同一项目在不同检测系统检测时应进行方法比对和偏倚评估,以确保检测结果的可比性和连续性。

关 键 词:生长激素  方法比对  偏倚评估

Comparative analysis and bias assessment of detecting results of human growth hormone using two chemiluminescence ap-paratus
YANG Fang-hua , DENG Fang-mei , SUN Li-fang.Comparative analysis and bias assessment of detecting results of human growth hormone using two chemiluminescence ap-paratus[J].Laboratory Medicine and Clinic,2013(21):2807-2808,2810.
Authors:YANG Fang-hua  DENG Fang-mei  SUN Li-fang
Institution:YANG Fang-hua ,DENG Fang-mei , SUN Li- fang (Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shenzhen Chil- drenrs Hospital ,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518026 ,China)
Abstract:Objective To explore the comparability of human growth hormone(hGH) detected by chemilumi- nescence apparatus of SIEMENS Immulite 1000 and Beckman Coulter DXI 800 detection systems,through methodology comparing and bias assessing. Methods According to Clinic and Laboratory Standrd Instritate(CLSI) EP9-A2 document,at least 8 copies of different concentrations of fresh serum were collected everyday, then we tested hGH with two detection systems for at least 5 days continuously. Every sample was detected repeatedly with obverse and reverse sequence,then we recorded the results, checked outlier,observed linearity and data distribute,and calculated correlation coefficient and linear regression equation. According to the regression equation,we calculated hGH in the critical value of the expected bias and the expected bias of the 95 % confidence interval,and determined the bias ac- cepted or not. Results The correlation coefficient(r) of two detection systems in hGH was 0. 999 ,and the difference of mean results was negative bias. The bias was in the permissible error range, and it was acceptable. Conclusion Methodology comparison and bias estimation of the same test items in different detection systems should be carried out regularly in order to ensure comparability and continuity of test results.
Keywords:grow hormone  method comparison  bias estimation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号