首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Blended learning vs traditional teaching: The potential of a novel teaching strategy in nursing education - a systematic review and meta-analysis
Institution:1. Anglia Ruskin University, UK;2. Edge Hill University, UK;3. University College London, UK;4. Manchester Metropolitan University, UK;1. School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan;2. Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkuo, Taoyuan, Taiwan;3. Department of General Surgery, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Linkuo Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan;4. Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan;1. Department of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden;2. Department of Health Sciences, The Faculty of Health, Science and Technology, Karlstad University, Sweden;3. Department of Bachelor’s in Nursing, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway;1. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Gazi University, 06490 Ankara, Turkey;2. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University, 70200 Karaman, Turkey
Abstract:AimThe primary goal of this analysis is to determine the effectiveness of blended learning versus traditional face-to-face teaching in nursing education from the three aspects of knowledge, skills and satisfaction.BackgroundWith the rapid development of health care, traditional teaching has been unable to meet the learning needs of nursing education. With the development of Internet technology, blended learning seems to be a new available choice to solve the current predicament. However, the effectiveness of blended learning is still controversial. In addition, most studies have primarily evaluated the teaching effect unilaterally.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library for publications in English from inception to April 2021. Two researchers independently screened the eligibility of each publication and extracted the data. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the MINORS (methodological items for non-randomized studies) were used to evaluate the quality of the studies. The statistical heterogeneity was analyzed by the meta-regression and subgroup analysis. Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test.ResultsThe search strategy identified a total of 3682 potentially relevant articles. We finally included 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 12 quasi-experimental studies (QRs), with a total of 2706 nursing students. The meta-analysis results showed that blended learning is more effective than traditional teaching in terms of knowledge, skill performance and learning satisfaction (SMD=0.64, z = 3.237, p = 0.001; SMD = 0.37, z = 2.58, p = 0.010; SMD = 0.32, z = 2.347, p = 0.019). Egger's test showed no significant publication bias. In addition, sensitivity analysis suggested that the results are relatively reliable. Through subgroup analysis and meta regression, we found that although the heterogeneity could not be significantly reduced or eliminated, the publication year, the study design and the duration of the intervention time and the number of items in the intervention may be the potential factors affecting heterogeneity of knowledge and learning satisfaction.ConclusionsThe research results showed that blended learning may be an effective teaching strategy and appears to have excellent long-term developmental potential. Although its initial construction may require specific investment to improve the teaching resources and standardize the design of blended learning, in the long term, this new teaching strategy can not only improve nursing students' professional ability and learning satisfaction but also save nursing education resources to promote the balanced development of nursing education. The results of this study can lay a foundation for establishing standardized blended teaching strategies and evaluation indicators in the future.
Keywords:Blended learning  Traditional teaching  Nursing education  Nursing students  Knowledge  Skill performance  Learning satisfaction  Systematic review  Meta-analysis
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号