首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Marginal ulcer perforation: a single center experience
Authors:S.?K.?Natarajan  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:nsureshkhanna@yahoo.co.in"   title="  nsureshkhanna@yahoo.co.in"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author  author-information__orcid u-icon-before icon--orcid u-icon-no-repeat"  >  http://orcid.org/---"   itemprop="  url"   title="  View OrcID profile"   target="  _blank"   rel="  noopener"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  OrcID"   data-track-label="  "  >View author&#  s OrcID profile,D.?Chua,K.?Anbalakan,V.?G.?Shelat
Affiliation:1.Department of General Surgery,Tan Tock Seng Hospital,Singapore,Singapore;2.Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine,National University of Singapore,Singapore,Singapore;3.Singapore,Singapore
Abstract:

Purpose

Marginal ulcer (MU) is defined as ulcer on the jejunal side of the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) anastomosis. Most MUs are managed medically but those with complications like bleeding or perforation require intervention. It is recommended that GJ anastomosis be revised in patients with MU perforation (MUP). The aim of this case series is to study the clinical presentation and management of MUP.

Methods

Three hundred and thirty-two patients who underwent emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer at a single center were studied over a period of 5 years.

Results

Nine patients (2.7 %) presented with MUP. GJ was previously done for either complicated peptic ulcer (n = 4) or for suspected gastric malignancy (n = 5). Two patients had previously completed H. pylori therapy. None of the patients presented with septic shock. MU was on the jejunal side of GJ in all patients. The median MUP size was 10 mm. Four patients (44.4 %) had omental patch repair, three (33.3 %) had primary closure, and one each had revision of GJ and jejunal serosal patch repair. There were no leaks, intra-abdominal abscess or reoperation and no malignancies.

Conclusion

MUP patients do not present with septic shock. Omental patch repair or primary closure is sufficient enough. Revision of Billroth-II-GJ into Roux-en-Y-GJ is not mandatory.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号