Left-sided breast cancer irradiation using rotational and fixed-field radiotherapy |
| |
| Affiliation: | 2. Department of Radiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX;3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO;4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC;2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey;3. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Bogazici University Istanbul, Turkey;4. Istanbul University, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey;2. Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan;3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan;2. Drexel University College of Medicine, Allegheny Campus, Philadelphia, PA;2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL;2. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia |
| |
| Abstract: | The 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) technique is the standard for breast cancer radiotherapy. During treatment planning, not only the coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) but also the minimization of the dose to critical structures, such as the lung, heart, and contralateral breast tissue, need to be considered. Because of the complexity and variations of patient anatomy, more advanced radiotherapy techniques are sometimes desired to better meet the planning goals. In this study, we evaluated external-beam radiation treatment techniques for left breast cancer using various delivery platforms: fixed-field including TomoDirect (TD), static intensity-modulated radiotherapy (sIMRT), and rotational radiotherapy including Elekta volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and tomotherapy helical (TH). A total of 10 patients with left-sided breast cancer who did or did not have positive lymph nodes and were previously treated with 3DCRT/sIMRT to the entire breast were selected, their treatment was planned with Monaco VMAT, TD, and TH. Dosimetric parameters including PTV coverage, organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing, dose-volume histograms, and target minimum/maximum/mean doses were evaluated. It is found that for plans providing comparable PTV coverage, the Elekta VMAT plans were generally more inhomogeneous than the TH and TD plans. For the cases with regional node involvement, the average mean doses administered to the heart were 9.2 (± 5.2) and 8.8 (± 3.0) Gy in the VMAT and TH plans compared with 11.9 (± 6.4) and 11.8 (± 9.2) Gy for the 3DCRT and TD plans, respectively, with slightly higher doses given to the contralateral lung or breast or both. On average, the total monitor units for VMAT plans are 11.6% of those TH plans. Our studies have shown that VMAT and TH plans offer certain dosimetric advantages over fixed-field IMRT plans for advanced breast cancer requiring regional nodal treatment. However, for early-stage breast cancer fixed-field radiotherapy is potentially more beneficial in terms of OAR sparing. |
| |
| Keywords: | Breast irradiation MONACO Elekta VMAT Tomotherapy helical TomoDirect |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
