首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


A comparison of small-field tissue phantom ratio data generation methods for an Elekta Agility 6 MV photon beam
Institution:1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan;2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama;3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado at Denver, Denver, Colorado;4. Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas;5. Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;6. Radiation Oncology, SSM Cancer Care, St Louis, Missouri;7. Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
Abstract:Tissue-phantom ratios (TPRs) are a common dosimetric quantity used to describe the change in dose with depth in tissue. These can be challenging and time consuming to measure. The conversion of percentage depth dose (PDD) data using standard formulae is widely employed as an alternative method in generating TPR. However, the applicability of these formulae for small fields has been questioned in the literature. Functional representation has also been proposed for small-field TPR production. This article compares measured TPR data for small 6 MV photon fields against that generated by conversion of PDD using standard formulae to assess the efficacy of the conversion data. By functionally fitting the measured TPR data for square fields greater than 4 cm in length, the TPR curves for smaller fields are generated and compared with measurements. TPRs and PDDs were measured in a water tank for a range of square field sizes. The PDDs were converted to TPRs using standard formulae. TPRs for fields of 4 × 4 cm2 and larger were used to create functional fits. The parameterization coefficients were used to construct extrapolated TPR curves for 1 × 1 cm2, 2 × 2-cm2, and 3 × 3-cm2 fields. The TPR data generated using standard formulae were in excellent agreement with direct TPR measurements. The TPR data for 1 × 1-cm2, 2 × 2-cm2, and 3 × 3-cm2 fields created by extrapolation of the larger field functional fits gave inaccurate initial results. The corresponding mean differences for the 3 fields were 4.0%, 2.0%, and 0.9%. Generation of TPR data using a standard PDD-conversion methodology has been shown to give good agreement with our directly measured data for small fields. However, extrapolation of TPR data using the functional fit to fields of 4 × 4 cm2 or larger resulted in generation of TPR curves that did not compare well with the measured data.
Keywords:Radiotherapy  Dosimetry
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号