Immunohistochemical and Ultrastructural Investigation of Neural Differentiation in Ewing Sarcoma/PNET of Bone and Soft Tissues

The authors evaluated the role of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy in defining neural differentiation in 28 cases of Ewing sarcoma/ PNET. The panel of primary antibodies used included vimentin, MIC-2, NSE, S-100 protein, leu7, neurofilaments, GFAP, and chromogranin A. Cases were considered undifferentiated when neural markers were absent, poorly differentiated if one neural marker was present, and well differentiated if two or more markers were observed. Cases were also evaluated for the presence of cytoplasmic processes, microtubules, and neurosecretory granules as ultrastructural features of neural differentiation: the tumor was classified as well differentiated if two of these features were present; and poorly differentiated if one was evident; all other cases were considered undifferentiated. According to immunohistochemistry, 10 cases (35.7%) were undifferentiated, 12 cases (42.9%) were poorly differentiated, and 6 (21.4%) were well differentiated. According to the ultrastructural analysis, 10 tumors were undifferentiated (35.7%), 14 poorly differentiated (50%), and 4 well differentiated (14.3%). The overall concordance between the two techniques was low (35.7%), and both modalities were concordant in classifying only 1 well-differentiated, 5 poorly differentiated, and 4 undifferentiated tumors. In conclusion, the authors suggest that investigations devoted to test the prognostic significance of neural differentiation in these neoplasms should employ both immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, separately and in combination, to assess what is the most effective choice for predicting the clinical course.