| 大型生活垃圾焚烧炉炉排炉漏渣输送方式比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王占磊,周圣庆,曹德标,张翼翔.大型生活垃圾焚烧炉炉排炉漏渣输送方式比较[J].环境卫生工程,2014(3):67-68. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王占磊 周圣庆 曹德标 张翼翔 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南通天蓝环保能源成套设备有限公司; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 以山东省滨州市生活垃圾焚烧发电项目为例,比较了400 t/d机械往复式炉排炉炉排漏渣输送方式焚烧炉干式输灰和湿式输灰的优缺点,并进行了成本分析。
|
| 关 键 词： | 大型生活垃圾焚烧炉 炉排炉漏渣 灰渣斗 输送机 |
Comparison of Transportation Modes for Grate Residue in Large-scale Domestic Waste Furnaces |
| |
| Wang Zhanlei,Zhou Shengqing,Cao Debiao,Zhang Yixiang.Comparison of Transportation Modes for Grate Residue in Large-scale Domestic Waste Furnaces[J].Environmental Sanitation Engineering,2014(3):67-68. |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Zhanlei Zhou Shengqing Cao Debiao Zhang Yixiang |
| |
| Institution: | (Nantong Tianlan Environmental ＆ Energetic Equipment Co., Ltd, Nantong Jiangsu 226600) |
| |
| Abstract: | Taking the example of Shandong Binzhou domestic waste incineration power generation project, the strengths and weaknesses of dry ash convey and wet ash convey in 400 t/d mechanical reciprocating grates were compared, and the cost analysis was carried out |
| |
| Keywords: | large-scale domestic waste furnace grate residue ash bucket conveyor |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
