|
|||||
|
|
Comparison of plate osteosynthesis versus non-operative management for mid-shaft clavicle fractures—A prospective study |
|
| Institution: | 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Prakash Institue of Medical Sciences, Islampu-Sangle Road, Tal- Walwa, Sangli, Uran, Islampur, 415409, Maharsahtra, India;2. DDU, Hari Nagar, New Delhi, India;1. North West London Pathology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Fulham Palace Road, London, W6 8RF, United Kingdom;2. Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom;1. Department of War Surgery, Kirov Military Medical Academy, 6 Lebedeva Street, Saint-Petersburg 194044, Russian Federation;2. Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1, Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan;3. Department of Radiology, Kirov Military Medical Academy, 6 Lebedeva Street, Saint-Petersburg 194044, Russian Federation;4. R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, 22 S Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;1. KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium;2. KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium;3. University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Trauma Surgery, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium;4. University Hospitals Leuven, Management Information and Reporting, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium;1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China;2. Department of Hand Surgery, Wuxi N0.9 People’s Hospital affiliated to Soochow University, Wuxi, China;3. Division of Plastic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States |
| Abstract: | IntroductionTreatment for mid-shaft clavicle fractures has recently seen a paradigm shift towards surgical management. The aim of the study was to compare clinical and functional outcome between plate osteosynthesis and conservative line of management in middle-third clavicle fractures.Material and methodsA prospective randomized study was conducted on 69 patients with closed displaced clavicle fractures between May 2014 and May 2016. Patients with medial or lateral third clavicle fractures, polytrauma and compound fractures were excluded from the study. Patients treated with plating were in group A (n = 36) while those treated with arm pouch were in group B (n = 33).ResultsThe mean age of the patient in group A was 32.4 ± 43 and group B was 31.7 ± 26 years. 48 (69.9%) females were involved in the study. History of fall was the most common mechanism of injury affecting 51 (73.9%) patients. All the patients were type 2 B as per the Robinson classification system. The average operative duration was 78.3 ± 12.4 min. Union was seen at 15.6 ± 0.8 in group A and 22.8 ± 0.4 in group B (p < 0.0001). Two (6%) of the patients in group B had non-union. One (2.7%) patient in group A had mal-union. Two (5.5%) patients had plate prominence. One (2.7%) patient had superficial infection. The Constant and Murley scoring at 24 months was 89.42 and 76.24 in group A and group B respectively.ConclusionPlating for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures is can lead to better functional and radiological outcomes with minimal complications as compared to the conservative modality of treatment. |
| Keywords: | Clavicle Fractures Plate osteosynthesis |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ | |