首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Mortality in patients sustaining a periprosthetic fracture following a previous extracapsular hip fracture fixation
Institution:1. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leeds General Infirmary, United Kingdom;2. Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, United Kingdom;3. University of Huddersfield, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, United Kingdom;1. Critical Care Unit, Toulouse University Hospital, Avenue du Pr Jean Poulhès, 31059 Toulouse, France;2. Institut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires, INSERM U1048, Université Paul Sabatier, Avenue du Pr Jean Poulhès, 31059 Toulouse, France;1. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland;2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
Abstract:BackgroundMortality rates following hip fractures are decreasing. As these outcomes improve, it increases the potential for further falls and the potential to sustain a periprosthetic fracture. The aim of this study was to analyse the 1 year mortality of periprosthetic fractures around an implant used to treat an extracapsular hip fracture. Secondary outcomes included 30 day mortality, complications and risk factors associated with mortality.MethodsA retrospective case note and radiographic review of all patients who presented to a single institution with a periprosthetic femoral fracture around an implant previously used to treat an extracapsular hip fracture between 1st January and 2008 and 31st May 2015.Results29 patients with a mean age of 75.8. 6 males and 23 females. 20 (69.0%) patients had capacity to consent for surgery. Pre-operatively 34.5% mobilised independently without any walking aids. 79.3% lived at home. 62.1% had a Charlson co-morbidity score of 0 or 1, 27.6% a score of 2 or 3, 6.9% a score of 4 and 5, and 3.4% a score of more than 5.3.4% was ASA grade 1, 13.8% ASA2, 65.5% ASA 3 and 17.2% were ASA 4. The previous implant a dynamic hip screw in 75.9% dynamic hip screws and an intramedullary nail in 24.1%. There were 4 (13.8%) in-patient deaths. The 30 day mortality 17.2% (5 patients) was and the 1 year mortality was 44.8% (13 patients). There were 0 complications that required return to surgery during admission. 1 patient with a revision intramedullary nail had dynamisation performed due to delayed union 7 months following surgery. 1 patient required removal of metalwork 2 years following surgery for infection. When comparing risk factors for mortality, there were no significant risk factors found in this study for 30 day and 1 year mortality.ConclusionsThis paper suggests that periprosthetic fractures sustained after the surgical treatment of extra capsular neck of femur fractures have higher mortality rates than hip fractures. These patients should be given the same priority as these patients in there management.
Keywords:Extracapsular  Hip fracture  Periprosthetic fracture  Mortality
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号