Propofol anaesthesia in paediatric ambulatory patients: a comparison with thiopentone and halothane

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the haemodynamic changes during induction, as well as the speed and quality of recovery when propofol (vs thiopentone and/or halothane) was used for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in paediatric outpatients. One hundred unmedicated children, 3–12-yr-old, scheduled for ambulatory surgery were studied. The most common surgical procedures performed were eye muscle surgery (42%), plastic surgery (21%), dental restoration (15%), and urological procedures (15%). The children were randomized to an anaesthetic regimen for induction/maintenance as follows: propofol/propofol infusion; propofol/halothane; thiopentone/halothane; halothane for both induction and maintenance. Succinylcholine 1.5 mg · kg^?1 was used to facilitate tracheal intubation and N₂O/O₂ were used as the carrier gases in each case. All maintenance drugs were titrated according to the clinical response of the patient to prevent movement and/or maintain BP ± 20% of baseline. Two patients (4%) who received propofol expressed discomfort during injection. The mean propofol dose required to prevent movement was 267 ± 83 μg · kg^?1 · min^?1. The overall pattern of haemodynamic changes, as well as awakening (extubation) times were not different among the four groups. Children who received propofol recovered faster (22 vs 29–36 min) (P < 0.05), were discharged home sooner (101 vs 127–144 min) (P < 0.05), and had less postoperative vomiting (4 vs 24–48%) (P < 0.05) than all others. There were no serious complications or adverse postoperative sequelae in any of the patients in the study. It is concluded that induction and maintenance of anaesthesia with propofol is a well-tolerated anaesthetic technique in children, and is associated with faster recovery and discharged as well as less vomiting than when halothane is used.