Mercury Exposure in Young Children Living in New York City |
| |
Authors: | Helen S. Rogers Nancy Jeffery Stephanie Kieszak Pat Fritz Henry Spliethoff Christopher D. Palmer Patrick J. Parsons Daniel E. Kass Kathy Caldwell George Eadon Carol Rubin |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, 1600 Clifton Rd MS D76, Chamblee, GA, USA;(2) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Zoonotic, Vector-borne and Enteric Diseases, Atlanta, GA, USA;(3) New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Bureau of Environmental Surveillance and Policy, 253 Broadway, CN 34C, New York, NY 10007, USA;(4) Center for Environmental Health, New York State Department of Health, Troy, NY, USA;(5) Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA;(6) Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, The University of Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA;(7) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, 4770 Buford Highway MS F-46, Chamblee, GA 30341, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Residential exposure to vapor from current or previous cultural use of mercury could harm children living in rental (apartment) homes. That concern prompted the following agencies to conduct a study to assess pediatric mercury exposure in New York City communities by measuring urine mercury levels: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene’s (NYCDOHMH) Bureau of Environmental Surveillance and Policy, New York State Department of Health/Center for Environmental Health (NYSDOHCEH), Wadsworth Center’s Biomonitoring Program/Trace Elements Laboratory (WC-TEL), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). A previous study indicated that people could obtain mercury for ritualistic use from botanicas located in Brooklyn, Manhattan, and the Bronx. Working closely with local community partners, we concentrated our recruiting efforts through health clinics located in potentially affected neighborhoods. We developed posters to advertise the study, conducted active outreach through local partners, and, as compensation for participation in the study, we offered a food gift certificate redeemable at a local grocer. We collected 460 urine specimens and analyzed them for total mercury. Overall, geometric mean urine total mercury was 0.31 μg mercury/l urine. One sample was 24 μg mercury/l urine, which exceeded the (20 μg mercury/l urine) NYSDOH Heavy Metal Registry reporting threshold for urine mercury exposure. Geometric mean urine mercury levels were uniformly low and did not differ by neighborhood or with any clinical significance by children’s ethnicity. Few parents reported the presence of mercury at home, in a charm, or other item (e.g., skin-lightening creams and soaps), and we found no association between these potential sources of exposure and a child’s urinary mercury levels. All pediatric mercury levels measured in this study were well below a level considered to be of medical concern. This study found neither self-reported nor measured evidence of significant mercury use or exposure among participating children. Because some participants were aware of the possibility that they could acquire and use mercury for cultural or ritualistic purposes, community education about the health hazards of mercury should continue. |
| |
Keywords: | Mercury Urine Children Botanicas Azogue (Spanish word for mercury) |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|