首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

电针、红外线加揿针治疗颈椎病临床观察
引用本文:王一红,沈瑾,谢腾.电针、红外线加揿针治疗颈椎病临床观察[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2010,34(4).
作者姓名:王一红  沈瑾  谢腾
作者单位:1. 浙江省杭州市上城区第二医院,杭州,310006
2. 浙江省杭州市第三医院
3. 浙江省杭州市拱墅区中医院
摘    要:目的]评价电针、红外线加揿针治疗颈椎病临床疗效。方法]将颈椎病患者随机分为两组,治疗组用电针、红外线加揿针治疗,对照组用电针配合红外线照射治疗,治疗一疗程进行评定。结果]治疗组45例,治愈8例,好转32例,未愈5例,总有效率88.89%;对照组45例,为治愈2例,好转28例,未愈15例,总有效率66.67%。两组治疗结果比较有显著性差异(P0.05)。结论]电针、红外线加揿针治疗颈椎病疗效优于电针、红外线治疗。

关 键 词:电针  揿针  埋针  运动疗法  颈椎病

Acusector Infrared and Pressed Needle Treat Spondylopathy
Wang Yihong,Xie Teng,Shen Jin.Acusector Infrared and Pressed Needle Treat Spondylopathy[J].Journal of Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2010,34(4).
Authors:Wang Yihong  Xie Teng  Shen Jin
Institution:Wang Yihong,Xie Teng,Shen Jin 1.Second Hospital of Shangcheng District,Hangzhou City,Zhejiang Province (310006),2.Third Hospital of Hangzhou City,Zhejiang Province
Abstract:Objective] To evaluate the clinical effect of acusector infrared and pressed needle on spondylopathy.Method] Randomly divide the patients into treatment group 1 with acusector infrared and pressed needle,and control group 2 with acusector and infrared.Result] In treatment group,8 cases were cured,32 better,5 not cured,and total effective rate 88.89%; for group 2,they were 2,28,15 and 66.67% respectively.There’s marked difference between them.Conclusion] Acusector infrared and pressed needle are better i...
Keywords:acusector  pressed needle  bury needle  sport therapy  spondylopathy  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号