中外数字化过渡期护理的可视化分析

目的 对比2012年以来数字化过渡期护理中英文文献的学科交叉情况、研究热点、研究前沿,为促进本土化创新提供借鉴。方法 采用文献可视化分析软件CiteSpace对2012～2022年Web of Science核心合集、中国知网中核心期刊收录文献进行可视化分析。结果 共检索得到中文文献202篇,英文文献1678篇,文献发布总体呈增高趋势;数字化过渡期护理领域内学科交叉较活跃;国内外干预人群、手段、场景、主要研究方式、关注问题及研究前沿方面存在差异,国内对过渡期药物管理、急诊管理、电子病历、家庭照顾者负担等方面关注较少;共被引分析发现国外文献的知识基础为评价指标和干预方式,经典研究问题为降低再入院率与用药安全,研究热点为以人为本,研究前沿为个性化照护。结论 政策制定与完善可促进过渡期照护模式规范化建设与发展,应以数字化健康服务体系建设为契机优化过渡期护理模式,加快照护服务体系建设,促进评价指标体系完善。

Visual analysis of digital transformation in transitional care based on citespace

Objective To compare the interdisciplinary situation, focused issues and trends of Chinese and English literature in the field of transitional care since 2012, so as to provide reference for promoting localization innovation. Methods CiteSpace, a literature visualization analysis software, was used to analyze the literature in the core collection of Web of Science and the core journals of CNKI from 2012 to 2022. Results A total of 202 articles were searched in Chinese and 1678 articles in English. The literature publication showed an increasing trend. The interdisciplinary crossover in the field of digital transitional care was active. There were differences in the research population, means, scenarios, main research approaches, concerns and research frontiers at home and abroad. In China, there was less attention paid to medication management, emergency management, electronic medical records and family caregiver burden. Co-citation analysis found that the knowledge basis of foreign literature was evaluation indicators and intervention approaches, the classic research questions were reducing readmission rates and medication safety, the research hotspot was person-centred care, and the research frontier was personalised care. Conclusion Policy formulation and improvement can promote standardization in transitional care, and we should take the construction of digital health service system as an opportunity to optimize the transitional care model, increase the complement of transitional care service system, and promote the improvement of the evaluation index system.