Ten-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of in-stent restenosis in saphenous vein grafts |
| |
Authors: | Constantin Kuna MD Nadine Wiedenmayer Christian Bradaric MD Antonia Presch MD Felix Voll MD Sebastian Kufner MD Tareq Ibrahim MD Heribert Schunkert MD Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz MD Salvatore Cassese MD PhD Adnan Kastrati MD Jens Wiebe MD |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany;2. Clinic and Policlinic Internal Medicine I (Cardiology and Angiology), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany;3. Department of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany;4. Clinic and Policlinic Internal Medicine I (Cardiology and Angiology), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Background Only few data is available for long-term outcomes of patients being treated for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in saphenous vein grafts (SVG). Aims Thus, the aim of this observational, retrospective study was to close this lack of evidence. Methods Between January 2007 and February 2021 a total of 163 patients with 186 ISR lesions located in SVG were treated at two large-volume centers in Munich, Germany. Endpoints of interest were all-cause mortality, target lesion revascularization (TLR) and target vessel myocardial infarction (TVMI). Furthermore, recurrent ISR were assessed. Outcomes are presented as Kaplan–Meier event rates. Results Mean age was 72.6 ± 8.6 years, 90.8% were male, 36.8% were diabetics and 42.3% presented an acute coronary syndrome. ISR were treated with DES in 64.0% and with balloon angioplasty (BA) in 36.0%. After 10 years, the rates for all-cause mortality, TVMI and TLR were 58.2%, 15.4%, and 22.6%, respectively. No statistically relevant differences were found between the types of treatment (DES or BA) regarding all-cause mortality (55.7% vs. 63.2%, p = 0.181), TVMI (13.8% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.215) and TLR (21.8% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.764). Median time between first and recurrent ISR was 270.8 days. Recurrent ISR were treated with DES in a comparable proportion as during first ISR (p = 0.075). Independent predictor of TLR is patient age (p = 0.034). The median follow-up duration was 5.1 years (75% CI 2.8; 8.5). Conclusions Clinical event rates after intervention of ISR located in SVG are high without statistically relevant differences regarding the type of treatment. However, further studies are needed. |
| |
Keywords: | drug-coated balloon drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis saphenous vein graft |
|
|