首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Developing evidence-based immunization recommendations and GRADE
Authors:P. Duclos  D.N. Durrheim  A.L. Reingold  Z.A. Bhutta  K. Vannice  H. Rees
Affiliation:1. Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, 20 Ave Appia, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland;2. University of Newcastle, 10 Longworth Avenue, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend 2287, NSW, Australia;3. Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, 101 Haviland Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;4. Maternal and Child Health Division, The Aga Khan University, PO Box 3500, Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan;5. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States;6. Reproductive Heath and RIV Research Institute, Wits Institute, Hugh Solomon Building, Corner Esselen and Klein Streets, Hillbrow 2038, Joahanneburg, South Africa
Abstract:The Strategic Group of Advisory Experts (SAGE) on immunization is an independent advisory committee with a mandate to advise the World Health Organization (WHO) on the development of vaccine and immunization related policies. SAGE working groups are established on a time-limited basis to review and provide evidence-based recommendations, together with their implications, for open deliberation and decision-making by SAGE. In making its recommendations, SAGE takes into consideration: the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of the disease; vaccine and immunization characteristics; economic analysis; health system considerations; the existence of and interaction with other intervention and control strategies; costing and social impacts; and legal and ethical concerns. Since 1998, WHO has produced evidence-based vaccine position papers for use primarily by national public health officials and immunization programme managers. Since April 2006 all new or updated position papers have been based on SAGE recommendations. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach has been adopted by WHO and, since 2008, GRADE tables that rate the quality of evidence have been produced in support of key recommendations. SAGE previously expressed concern that GRADE was not ideally suited to many immunization-specific issues such as the vaccine population level effect and the inclusion of surveillance system data, particularly for vaccine safety. Extensive productive interactions with various advisory groups including the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, the European Centres for Disease Control, the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO), WHO's Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety and the GRADE working group resulted in key enhancements to accommodate vaccine-relevant evidence. This facilitated integration and acceptability of the GRADE approach in the development of immunization related SAGE and WHO recommendations. Ongoing utilisation should result in further fine-tuning of the approach to ensure that recommendations are based on the full range of appropriate evidence.
Keywords:GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation   PICO, population/intervention/comparator/outcome   RCTs, randomized controlled trials   SAGE, Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on immunization   WHO, World Health Organization   WG, working group
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号