Direct trocar insertion versus Veress needle insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: Direct insertion of the trocar is an alternative method to Veress needle insertion for the creation of pneumoperitoneum. The safety of direct disposable shielded trocar insertion for the creation of pneumoperitoneum was assessed by comparing with Veress needle insertion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: One thousand five hundred patients undergoing LC with pneumoperitoneum were included in this study. In 470 patients the Veress needle insertion technique was used, and in 1,030 patients direct trocar insertion technique was used. Patients having indications for open trocar insertion were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Complication rate was significantly higher in the Veress needle group (14% versus 0.9%; P <0.01), and the two major complications, gastric perforation and iliac artery laceration, were also encountered in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that with a lower complication rate, direct insertion of the disposable trocar is a safe alternative to Veress needle insertion technique for the creation of pneumoperitoneum. Such an approach has further advantages such as less cost/instrumentation and rapid creation of pneumoperitoneum.