首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

万拉法新与丁螺环酮治疗广泛性焦虑症对照研究
引用本文:刘玉厚,徐敏秀,郑振宝. 万拉法新与丁螺环酮治疗广泛性焦虑症对照研究[J]. 精神医学杂志, 2003, 16(1): 19-21
作者姓名:刘玉厚  徐敏秀  郑振宝
作者单位:山东省临沂市精神卫生中心 276005(刘玉厚,徐敏秀),山东省临沂市精神卫生中心 276005(郑振宝)
摘    要:目的 验证万拉法新治疗广泛性焦虑症的疗效及副反应。方法 对符合CCMD-2-R广泛性焦虑症诊断标准的患者,随机分为万拉法新组和丁螺环酮组治疗6周。于治疗前及治疗后1,2,4,5周末用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA),焦虑自评量表(SAS),临床总体评定量表(CGI)及副反应量表(TESS)评定临床疗效及副反应。结果 万拉法新与丁螺环酮疗效相当,起效时间相近,没有严重副反应。结论 万拉法新治疗广泛性焦虑症疗效确切,副反应少而轻,患者服药依从性好。

关 键 词:广泛性焦虑症 万拉法新 丁螺环酮
文章编号:1009-7201(2003)-01-0019-03

A clinical control study of venlafaxine and buspirone in the treatment of general anxiety disorder.
Liu Yuhou. Xu Minxiu,Zheng Zhenbao,Linyi Mental Health Center,Shandong ,China. A clinical control study of venlafaxine and buspirone in the treatment of general anxiety disorder.[J]. Journal of Psychiatry, 2003, 16(1): 19-21
Authors:Liu Yuhou. Xu Minxiu  Zheng Zhenbao  Linyi Mental Health Center  Shandong   China
Affiliation:Liu Yuhou. Xu Minxiu,Zheng Zhenbao,Linyi Mental Health Center,Shandong 276005,China
Abstract:Objective To verify the clinical efficacy and the side effects of venlafaxine in the treatment of general anxiety disorder. Methods 68 patients meeting CCMD-2-R criteria for general anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to venlafaxine group(n = 35) and buspirone group(n = 33)for 6 weeks. Effects and side effects were evaluated with Hamilton Anxiety Seale(HAMA),Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS) Clinical Global Impression Scale(CGI)and Treatment Emergent Symptoms Scale(TESS)before and after 1,2,4, 6-weeks treatment respectively. Results The therapeutic efficacy in venlafaxine group was similar to that in buspirone. Compared with buspirone , venlafaxine had few side effects. Conclusion It is suggested that venlafaxine was effective in the treatment of general anxiety disorder and produced fewer side effects.
Keywords:General anxiety disorder Venlafaxine Buspirone
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号