|
|||||
|
|
Psychological distress and lifestyle disruption in low-risk prostate cancer patients: Comparison between active surveillance and radical prostatectomy |
|
| Authors: | Andrew G. Matthew Orit Raz Kristen L. Currie Alyssa S. Louis Haiyan Jiang Tal Davidson |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada;2. Department of Urology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, Australia;3. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;4. Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada;5. Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada |
| Abstract: | Objective: To quantify distress in men treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or active surveillance (AS). Methods: In a retrospective cross-sectional design, we assessed men through questionnaire and investigator-designed questions. Results: RP patients worried more about cancer spread than AS patients. RP patients were influenced by friends for treatment decision, whereas AS patients were influenced by urologists. RP group report declines in intimacy and instrumental. AS men worried more about future health and dying than post-RP men. Conclusion: Fear of disease progression may be a motivating factor in choosing RP. AS patients adhere to their treatment decision in spite of distress. |
| Keywords: | active surveillance illness intrusiveness prostate cancer psychological distress radical prostatectomy treatment decision |