Mixed incontinence is more bothersome than pure incontinence subtypes |
| |
Authors: | Yashika Dooley Lior Lowenstein Kimberly Kenton MaryPat FitzGerald Linda Brubaker |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA;(2) Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MCHE-OG, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Drive, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6200, USA |
| |
Abstract: | The purpose of the study was to compare incontinence bother in women with mixed incontinence versus pure incontinence subtypes. This is an institutional review board-approved study comparing physical exam findings and responses to the Medical Epidemiologic and Social Aspects of Aging (MESA) questionnaire and the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6). The MESA responses were used to classify women as mixed, pure stress, or pure urge incontinence. This analysis includes 551 women with a mean age of 56 ± 16 years. Most women were Caucasian (86%) with 7% African American and 5% Hispanic. UDI scores were significantly higher in women with mixed incontinence (61 ± 23) than those with pure stress incontinence (40 ± 26) or pure urge incontinence (40 ± 25; p < 0.0001). Women with mixed incontinence report greater incontinence bother than women with either pure stress or urge incontinence. |
| |
Keywords: | Bother Mixed incontinence Quality of life Stress incontinence Urge incontinence |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|