Comparison studies of HPV detection in areas at different risk for cervical cancer.

The hypothesis of a geographical correlation between HPV detection rates and incidence of cervical cancer has been investigated in studies of various types. However, results from these studies are equivocal, in contrast to findings concerning other suspected risk factors which seem to correlate well with the cervical cancer incidence. Possible explanations include (1) greater sensitivity of ecological studies to cumulative exposures such as lifetime number of sexual partners, lifetime smoking and seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2, than to HPV DNA prevalence which does not reflect cumulative exposure to HPV and (2) misclassification in the HPV diagnosis leading to wrong prevalence estimates. In future research, it will be important to establish the sensitivity and specificity of the different methods and conduct intra- and interlaboratory validation studies in order to standardize methods. In spite of the limitations of cross-sectional studies, the measurement of HPV prevalence and its correlation with, for example, sexual behaviour is still valuable for our understanding and interpretation of the role of HPV infections.