人工流产术后放置吉妮IUD和爱母IUD的临床效果对比分析

目的对比分析人工流产后放置吉妮IUD和爱母IUD的临床效果。方法选择2009年1月～2011年2月在本院行人工流产术后知情选择并即时放置宫内节育器（IUD）的220例妇女,其中,应用吉妮IUD121例（Ⅰ组）,应用爱母IUD99例（Ⅱ组）,随访1年,比较两种IUD的临床效果。结果Ⅰ组术后IUD脱落率、因症取出率均明显低于Ⅱ组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,而续用率高于Ⅱ组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;两组的带器妊娠率比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论两种IUD均安全有效,但吉妮IUD临床效果更好、更安全长效、副作用小、脱落率低、继用率高,更适合人工流产后妇女使用。

The comparative analysis of clinical effects of GyneFix IN IUD and MCu IUD after abortion

Objective To compare and analysis the clinical efficacy of placing Jeanne IUD and loving mother IUD after induced abortion. Methods Two hundred and twenty women with induced abortion were placed IUD by the principle of informed consent from January 2009 to February 2011 in our hospital, they were divided into group Ⅰ (121 cases) and group Ⅱ (99 cases), and the group Ⅰwas placed Jeanne IUD while the group Ⅱ was placed loving mother IUD, all of the women were followed up for 1 year, then compared the clinical efficacy of the two groups. Results The IUD expulsion rate and removal rate due to disease in the group Ⅰ were lower than that of the group Ⅱ, there were significant difference between two groups (P < 0.05) , while the renewal rate in group Ⅰ was significant higher than group Ⅱ, there were significant difference between two groups (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in the pregnancy rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion Both of the two IUDs are safe and effective, however, the Jeanne IUD had higher clinical efficacy, safer and longer term, less side effects, lower loss rate, higher continue using rate and more suitable for the women after induced abortion than the loving mother IUD.