HOLYPROTM网片与HOLYPROTM网塞修补初发腹股沟疝的疗效比较 |
| |
引用本文: | 朱勤,秦宏图,秦风雷,张炳忠.HOLYPROTM网片与HOLYPROTM网塞修补初发腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J].黑龙江医学,2011,35(5):374-376. |
| |
作者姓名: | 朱勤 秦宏图 秦风雷 张炳忠 |
| |
作者单位: | 南通市通州区兴东医院,江苏,南通,656300 |
| |
摘 要: | 目的 比较HOLYPROTM网片和HOLYPROTM网塞修补初发腹股沟疝的临床疗效.方法 HOLYPROTM网片组(简称网片组)99例,HOLYPROTM网塞修补组(简称网塞组)79例.将两组的术前评估、手术时间、术后反应、住院天数、术后并发症,及随访复发进行了比较.结果 初发疝患者,网片组与网塞组的平均年龄、伴随疾病...
|
关 键 词: | HOLYPROTM网片 HOLYPROTM网塞 腹股沟疝修补术 比较 |
Clinical Effect of HOLYPROTM Mesh and HOLYPROTM Mesh Plug in Early Onset Inguinal Hernia Repair |
| |
Institution: | ZHU Qin,QIN Hong-tu,QIN Feng-lei,et al.(The Xingdong Hospital of Tongzhou District of Nantong City,Nantong 656300,CHINA) |
| |
Abstract: | Objective To compare the effect of HOLYPROTM mesh and HOLYPROTM mesh plug in early onset inguinal hernia repair.Methods HOLYPROTM mesh group(mesh group) 99 cases,HOLYPROTM mesh plug repair group(the mesh-plug group) 79 cases.The two groups preoperative evaluation,operative time,postoperative reactions,hospital stay,postoperative complications and recurrence were compared with follow-up.Results Patients with early onset hernia,mean age,accompanying diseases,early complications,length of hospital stay of two groups were no significant difference(P>0.05),Operation time,postoperative wound swelling reaction,pain,hospitalization costs in mesh group were significantly lower than thoese in the mesh plug group(P<0.05).The average follow-up 12 months(1~16 months).There were no recurrence in both groups.Conclusion Only HualiKang sheet mesh repair,pain response is low,less postoperative wound swelling;operation time is short,less technical steps required,low cost,and it might be suitable for promotion. |
| |
Keywords: | HOLYPROTM network HOLYPROTM mesh plug Inguinal hernia repair Comparison |
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|