The role of early 18F-FDG PET/CT in prediction of progression-free survival after 90Y radioembolization: comparison with RECIST and tumour density criteria

Purpose

This study evaluated the ability of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging to predict early response to ⁹⁰Y-radioembolization in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) using RECIST and lesion density (Choi) criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with liver metastases at 2?years and decline in tumour markers were the primary end-points of the study.

Methods

A total of 121 liver lesions were evaluated in 25 patients (14 men, 11 women) with liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and CECT before and 6–8?weeks after treatment. Changes in SUV_max, tumour density measured in terms of Hounsfield units and the sum of the longest diameters (LD) were calculated for the target liver lesions in each patient. The patient responses to treatment were categorized using EORTC PET criteria, tumour density criteria (Hounsfield units) and RECIST, and were correlated with the responses of tumour markers and 2-year PFS using Kaplan-Meier plots and the log-rank test for comparison. Multivariate proportional hazards (Cox) regression analysis was performed to assess the effect of relevant prognostic factors on PFS.

Results

Using ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT response criteria, 15 patients had a partial response (PR) and 10 patients had stable disease (SD), while using RECIST only 2 patients had a PR and 23 had SD. Two patients had a PR, 21 SD and 2 progressive disease using tumour density criteria. The mean changes in SUV_max, sum of the LDs and tumour density after treatment were 2.9?±?2.6, 7.3?±?14.4?mm and 1.9?±?13.18?HU, respectively. Patients who had a PR on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had a mean decrease of 44.5?% in SUV_max compared to those with SD who had a decrease of only 10.3?%. The decreases in SUV_max and sum of the LDs were significant (p?p?p?>?0.1065). The responses on the ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT studies were highly correlated with the responses of tumour markers (p?p?=?0.01 for CEA and p?=?0.02 for Ca19-9), while the responses on the CECT studies using both RECIST and tumour density criteria were not significantly correlated with the responses of tumour markers. The responses on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT studies also significantly predicted PFS (the median PFS in those with a PR was 12.0?months and in those with SD was 5?months, p?18F-FDG PET/CT studies and decreases in SUV_max of ≤2.0 were the strongest predictors of PFS.

Conclusion

Early response assessment to ⁹⁰Y-radioembolization using ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is superior to RECIST and tumour density, demonstrating a correlation with tumour markers and significantly predicting PFS in patients with liver metastases. This could enable early response-adapted treatment strategies to be employed.