| Affiliation: | From the Urology Clinic, Second University (RA, MDS, MD’A), Department of Oncology, Federico II University (GDL) and Service of Urology, National Cancer Institute (SP), Naples, Urology Clinic, Magna Graecia University (RD), Catanzaro, and Urology Unit, G. Rummo Hospital (LC), Benevento, Italy |
| Abstract: | PURPOSE: There is growing interest among urologists on the need for decreasing pain during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic MEDLINE search of clinical trials of any kind of anesthesia, analgesia or sedation during TRUS guided prostate biopsy published since 2000. We critically analyzed the impact of pain and discomfort associated with the procedure, the described methods for evaluating it and the different techniques that have been described. RESULTS: There is strong evidence in the current literature that patient tolerance and comfort during TRUS guided prostate biopsy can be improved by anesthesia/analgesia. What remains is the need to urge all urologists to introduce it in clinical practice as a routine part of the procedure, whatever the biopsy scheme. CONCLUSIONS: Of the various options periprostatic anesthetic infiltration has been shown to be safe, easy to perform and highly effective. It should be considered the gold standard at the moment, even if the optimal technique remains to be established. Further studies addressing this issue are warranted. |
