| Abstract: | Water‐displacement volumetry can be used for quantifying the volume of the leg. However, not much is known about its application in patients with peripheral oedema of cardiopulmonary origin. We measured the reproducibility of a water‐displacement apparatus with a solid object and in ten non‐oedematous clinical patients (group A). The day‐to‐day variability of the leg volume was assessed in the same group. The diurnal variability was assessed in ten patients with persisting peripheral oedema (group B). The effect of treatment on the severity of peripheral oedema was evaluated in another nine patients with peripheral oedema, who were in need of diuretic treatment (group C). Volumetric results were compared to the ankle circumference method and the body weight method. The coefficient of variation was 0·16% in the fixed object and 0·47% in group A. The day‐to‐day variability was 1·52% after 1 day and 1·76% after a mean interval of 4·8 days. In group B, leg volume and circumference increased during the day (5·9%, P<0·001, and 2·4%, P<0·01, respectively), while body weight remained unchanged. In group C, leg volume, circumference and body weight decreased significantly after treatment (13·1%, P<0·01, 7·1%, P<0·05, and 5·9%, P<0·05). The correlation between the changes in volume and body weight was poor (r=0·37, P=0·33). In conclusion, (1) water‐displacement volumetry is highly reproducible, (2) a diurnal variability of peripheral oedema was found, and (3) volumetry is a suitable tool for monitoring peripheral oedema, while the body weight method appears to be less accurate. |
