Expression of CD8 is associated with non-common type morphology and outcome in pediatric anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma |
| |
Authors: | Dmitriy Abramov Ilske Oschlies Martin Zimmermann Dmitriy Konovalov Christine Damm-Welk Wilhelm W?ssmann Wolfram Klapper |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.Department of Pathology, Hematopathology Section and Lymph Node Registry, University of Kiel, Germany;2.Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University of Hannover, Germany;3.Russian Federal Research and Clinical Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia;4.NHL-BFM Study Center, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Justus-Liebig University, Giessen, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma is characterized by morphological variability. Morphological variants (non-common subtype) are associated with a poor outcome. They display abundant reactive bystander cells admixed with the lymphoma cells. So far, the difficulty in distinguishing lymphoma cells from bystander cells by visual inspection has prevented detailed and reliable immunophenotypic analysis using conventional immunohistochemistry. To overcome these limitations, we analyzed 124 cases of pediatric anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma treated within clinical trials using immunofluorescence multi-staining and digital image analysis combining antibodies against anaplastic lymphoma kinase to specifically identify lymphoma cells with antibodies against CD30, CD3, CD5, CD8, Ki67 and phosphorylated STAT3. Non-common type anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphomas express CD8 more frequently than common type anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphomas (35.4% and 5.6%, respectively; P=0.0002). CD8 expression was associated with a poorer outcome. Importantly, in a multivariate analysis including clinical risk factors, histological subtype and CD8 expression, CD8-positivity proved to be an independent prognostic predictor of worse outcome (hazard ratio for survival 3.38, P=0.042). |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|