Advances in thrombolytic therapy

Summary Alteplase and saruplase are more fibrin-specific thrombolytic drugs than anistreplase. These and the thrombolytic drugs of the first generation (streptokinase and urokinase) have shortcomings and limitations. The prolonged intravenous maintenance infusions have been replaced by a bolus injection, accelerated infusions, or the combined intravenous administration of thrombolytic agents. Numerous truncated alteplase or saruplase molecules have been constructed by deletion and domain substitution or hybrids made of the two molecules without gaining in thrombolytic potency. Recombinant staphylokinase and plasminogen activator from bat saliva have some interesting properties and are being investigated. Thrombus-targeted thrombolytic drugs were constructed using monoclonal antibodies against fibrin fragments or against epitopes of activated platelets. Fibrin-specific thrombolytic drugs require the concomitant use of a potent antithrombotic drug to prevent reocclusion. Whether hirudin or synthetic thrombin inhibitors are superior to heparin and whether novel antiplatelet agents, including monoclonal antibodies to platelet receptors and disintegrins, are more effective than aspirin is under clinical investigation. The place of stable analogues of prostacyclin during thrombolytic treatment is still unsettled.