首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

心房颤动消融术中肺静脉传导恢复的识别及再干预对疗效的影响
引用本文:王新华,刘旭,孙育民,顾佳宁,施海峰,周立,胡伟.心房颤动消融术中肺静脉传导恢复的识别及再干预对疗效的影响[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2007,15(4):182-185.
作者姓名:王新华  刘旭  孙育民  顾佳宁  施海峰  周立  胡伟
作者单位:200030,上海市,上海交通大学附属胸科医院心内科
摘    要:目的观察阵发性心房颤动(房颤)环肺静脉电隔离术(CPVI)中不同观察时间内肺静脉传导急性恢复的发生率,并评价再次电隔离术对于临床疗效的影响。方法入选阵发性房颤患者90例,其中男性51例,女性39例,平均年龄56·4±12·3(45~73)岁;随机分为三组行CPVI,组A实现肺静脉电隔离不予观察,组B电隔离后观察时间30min,组C电隔离后观察时间60min,评价肺静脉传导恢复发生率并对其再次行电隔离术。术后随访心电图和24小时动态心电图评价疗效。结果所有患者顺利完成消融术。组A平均手术时间显著短于组B和组C。肺静脉隔离时间和X线透视时间三组中每两组差异均无统计学意义。组B左肺静脉隔离后30min传导恢复8例(25%),60min电位恢复共10例(31·2%);右肺静脉隔离后30min传导恢复6例(18·8%)。组C左肺静脉隔离后30min传导恢复9例(30%),60min传导恢复共11例(36·7%);右肺静脉隔离后30min7例(23·3%)传导恢复,60min共8例(26·7%)传导恢复。平均随访6·7±2·3(4~9)个月,组A17例(60·7%)、组B27例(84·3%)、组C26例(86·7%)无房性快速性心律失常发作,P=0·04。结论环肺静脉电隔离术中肺静脉传导急性恢复率为30%左右,多数发生在肺静脉隔离后30min内,再次电隔离术有助于提高消融成功率。

关 键 词:肺静脉  心房颤动  导管消融术
修稿时间:2007年6月13日

Effect of identification and treatment of early pulmonary vein re-connection on clinical results of atrial fibrillation ablation
WANG Xinhua,LIU Xu,SUN Yumin,et al..Effect of identification and treatment of early pulmonary vein re-connection on clinical results of atrial fibrillation ablation[J].Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology,2007,15(4):182-185.
Authors:WANG Xinhua  LIU Xu  SUN Yumin  
Institution:WANG Xinhua,LIU Xu,SUN Yumin,et al. Department of Cardiology,Chest Hospital Affilated to Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200030,China
Abstract:Objective To investigate the prevalence of acute pulmonary vein(PV) conduction recovery during observation time after PV isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation(AF),and to evaluate the impact of re-isolation treatment on clinical results.Methods Ninety cases with paroxysmal AF(51 males,mean age of 56.4 12.3 years) were randomized to 3 groups to undergo circumferential pulmonary vein isolation(CPVI).In group A there was no observation time post-ablation.In group B there was 30 minutes for observation time post-ablation and in group C,there was 60 minutes of observation time post-ablation.All PV re-conduction was re-isolated at the end of observation.ECG and Holter were performed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the ablation.Results All cases underwent the procedure successfully.The mean procedural time in group A was significantly shorter than in group B and group C,but there was no significant difference on fluoroscopic time and PV isolation time among the three groups.In group B,PV re-conduction occurred in 8 cases(25%) at 30 min post-isolation,in 10 cases(31.2%) at 60 min post-isolation for the left PVs,and in 6 cases(18.8%) at 30 min post-isolation for the right PVs.In group C,PV re-conduction occurred in 9 cases(30%) at 30 min post-isolation and in 11 cases(36.7%) at 60 min post-isolation for the left PVs;for the right PVs,re-connection occured in 7 cases(23.3%) at 30 min post-isolation and in 8 cases(26.7%) at 60 min post-isolation.During a mean follow-up of 6.7 2.3 months,17 cases(60.7%) in group A,27 cases(84.3%) in group B,and 26 cases(86.7%) in group C had no recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias,P=0.04.Conclusion The prevalence of acute PV conduction recovery was about 30% after PV isolation,which mostly occurred within 30 minutes after initial isolation.Re-isolation of recovered PV conduction may improve the success rate of ablation for paroxysmal AF.
Keywords:Atrial fibrillation  Pulmonary vein  Catheter ablation
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号