首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

单孔胸腔镜与三孔胸腔镜肺癌术后恢复效果的比较分析
引用本文:栗爱珍,王 亮,杨 莎,齐科雷,李 辉. 单孔胸腔镜与三孔胸腔镜肺癌术后恢复效果的比较分析[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2016, 37(6): 672. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2016.06.014
作者姓名:栗爱珍  王 亮  杨 莎  齐科雷  李 辉
作者单位:1. 河北省胸科医院胸外科,河北 石家庄 050041 ; 2. 河北省胸科医院呼吸科,河北 石家庄 050041 ;3. 河北省胸科医院肾内科,河北 石家庄 050041
基金项目:河北省科学技术研究与发展计划( 11276148)
摘    要:[摘要] 目的 探讨单孔胸腔镜与三孔胸腔镜肺癌术后恢复效果,分析单孔胸腔镜的优势。方法 回顾性分析137 例肺癌患者的临床资料。单孔胸腔镜肺癌手术患者 65 例为观察组,三孔胸腔镜肺癌手术患者 72 例为对照组,比较 2 组术中出血量、手术时间、引流量、拔管时间、住院时间、术后第 1 天和第 2 天视觉模拟量表( VisualAnalogueScale , VAS )评分、术后有无肩关节活动障碍、术后第 1 个月和第 3 个月切口不适感及切口满意程度等。结果 所有患者均在全胸腔镜下顺利完成手术,术后均未出现严重并发症。观察组与对照组在术中出血量、术后胸腔引流量、拔管时间、住院时间差异均无统计学意义( P >0.05 ),观察组手术时间长于对照组(P <0. 05 ),术后第 1 天和第 2 天VAS 评分低于对照组( P <0. 05 ),术后第 1 个月和第 3 个月切口不适感发生率低于对照组( P <0.05 ),切口满意度高于对照组( P <0.05 ),肩关节活动障碍发生率明显低于对照组(P <0.05 )。结论 单孔胸腔镜技术在手术效果上与三孔胸腔镜相同,但是术后恢复效果明显优于后者,值得临床推广。

关 键 词:肺肿瘤  胸腔镜检查  治疗结果  

Comparative analysis of postoperative recovery between single port and three ports VATS surgery of lung cancer
LI Ai-zhen,WANG Liang,YANG Sha,QI Ke-lei,LI Hui. Comparative analysis of postoperative recovery between single port and three ports VATS surgery of lung cancer[J]. Journal of Hebei Medical University, 2016, 37(6): 672. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2016.06.014
Authors:LI Ai-zhen  WANG Liang  YANG Sha  QI Ke-lei  LI Hui
Affiliation:1. DepartmentofThoracicSurgery , theChestHospitalofHebeiProvince , Shijiazhuang 050041 , China ;
2. DepartmentofRespriatory , theChestHospitalofHebeiProvince , Shijiazhuang 050041 , China ;
3. DepartmentofNephrolory , theChestHospitalofHebeiProvince , Shijiazhuang 050041 , China
Abstract:ObjectiveTo analysis the advanges of single port video assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS) compared to three port VATS in the lung cancer patitens. MethodsRetrospective analysis of clinical data of 137 patients with lung cancer were performed. Among the patients,65 cases undertooksingle port VATS surgery were observation group, and 72 cases received three ports VATS were control group. The operation time,blood loss, postoperative drainage amount, chest tube drainage duration,postoperative hospital stay, the Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) score pain score of the 1st and 2nd postoperative day,shoulder disfunction,the incision discomfort in the 30th and 90th postoperative day, and the incision satisfaction degree were evaluated between the two groups. ResultsAll the patients were underwent total VATS surgery successfully and no severe complications were observed. There were no significant difference onblood loss, postoperative drainage amount,chest tube drainage duration,postoperativep hospital day(P>005) between the two groups.Compared to control group,renees in operation time was longer(P<005), the VAS score of the 1st and 2nd postoperative day was lower(P<005), the incision discomfort of 30th and 90th postoperative day was reduced and the incision satisfaetion degree was significantly improved(P<005), shoulder disfunctionrate was lower(P<005) in observation group. ConclusionSingle port VATS surgery had the same result cmopared with the three ports VATS, but the postoperative recovery is more better in single port VATS surgery, which indicated single port VATS surgery is worthy of clinical promotion.
Keywords:lung neoplasms  thoracoscopy  treatment outcome  
点击此处可从《河北医科大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《河北医科大学学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号