首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

临床基础检验室不合格标本的拒收与纠正措施
引用本文:赵欣宇,赵明. 临床基础检验室不合格标本的拒收与纠正措施[J]. 沈阳医学院学报, 2013, 15(2): 96-98,104
作者姓名:赵欣宇  赵明
作者单位:中国医科大学附属第一医院检验科,辽宁沈阳,110001
摘    要:目的:通过对临床基础检验室不合格标本的数量及相应的拒收原因的分析,采取相应的纠正措施,完善实验室检验前管理,保证检验前质量控制,提高检验效率。方法:对2012年临床基础检验室不合格标本的拒收原因、数量及不合格率进行回顾性分析。结果:2012年1月、6月不合格标本数分别为605,865份;不合格率分别为1.2%,1.3%;其它月份不合格率均小于1%,下半年明显优于上半年;年度不合格标本总数为6028份,不合格率为0.82%。按照不合格标本拒收原因类型统计(年度):样本无采集时间数量为2449份,占不合格标本的40.63%;标本凝固数量为717份,占不合格标本的11.89%;标本量不足数量为556份,占不合格标本的9.22%;非本实验室标本数量为682份,占不合格标本的11.31%;医嘱停止数量为553份,占不合格标本的9.17%;样本号已占用数量为632分,占不合格标本的10.48%;其他(条码不清、信息错误、样本重复等)数量为439份,占不合格标本的7.28%。结论:采取培训、沟通及绩效考核方法纠正措施,有助于保证检验前质量控制,缩短检验时间,提高检验效率。

关 键 词:不合格标本  分析前错误  纠正措施

The Rejection and Prevention of Unacceptable Specimens in Clinical Laboratory
ZHAO Xinyu , ZHAO Ming. The Rejection and Prevention of Unacceptable Specimens in Clinical Laboratory[J]. Journal of Shenyang Medical College, 2013, 15(2): 96-98,104
Authors:ZHAO Xinyu    ZHAO Ming
Affiliation:(Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, China)
Abstract:Objective: To improve pre-analytical management, decrease laboratory error and enhance clinical laboratory working efficiency by the detection and prevention of unacceptable specimens. Methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted by the counting of unacceptable specimens for different reasons throughout the year of 2012. Results: The number of unqualified specimens on Jan and Jun was 605 and 865 respectively, with the unqualified rate of 1.2% and 1.3%. All the other months we less than 1%, with an obvious reduce in the latter 6 months comparing to the first 6 months, and the total number of this year's unacceptable speci- mens was 6 028 accounting for O. 82%. With in all these unacceptable samples throughout the year, 2 449 samples were rejected for the lack of sampling time accounting 40. 63%, 717 samples could not be analyzed for clotting before analysis accounting for 11.89%, 556 specimens were rejected for sample volume insufficiency accounting for 9.22%, 682 specimens were returned back for sending to the wrong lab, accounting for 11.31%, 553 samples were not adopted for the ceasing of order, 632 samples were rejected for sharing the same sample number with previous samples (wrong tagging) accounting for 10. 48%, other reasons (illegible tag, wrong information, duplicated samples) accounting for 7. 28% with the total number of 439. Conclusions: Education of staff, communication and oerformance aopraisal show ~eat capacity of decreasing total analysis time and improving working efficiency of clinical laboratories.
Keywords:unacceptable specimen  pre-analytical error  rejection method
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号