首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种镍钛系统根管预备后发生牙根微裂的体外研究
引用本文:陈晨,梁宇红,高学军. 两种镍钛系统根管预备后发生牙根微裂的体外研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2015, 47(1): 129-133. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2015.01.024
作者姓名:陈晨  梁宇红  高学军
作者单位:(北京大学口腔医学院·口腔医院牙体牙髓科,北京100081)
摘    要:目的:比较HyFlex CM和ProTaper Universal两种镍钛器械预备根管后,根尖区牙根微裂的发生率。方法:收集60颗完整的离体下颌切牙,使用自凝树脂和藻酸盐印模材料进行包埋,暴露根尖区3 mm。随机分成3组(n=20),对照组不进行根管预备,两个实验组分别使用HyFlex CM和ProTaper Universal镍钛器械预备根管至#40/0.06。根管预备后,在距根尖孔1 mm、2 mm、3 mm处进行水平切盘,利用立体显微镜观察并记录牙根不同横截面牙根微裂的产生情况。结果:对照组未观察到牙根裂的产生,HyFlex CM实验组牙根微裂的发生率为5%(1/20),ProTaper Universal实验组为85%(17/20),两实验组间牙根裂发生率的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:以HyFlex CM镍钛系统进行根管预备产生根尖部牙根微裂的风险明显低于ProTaper Universal。

关 键 词:根管制备  牙根微裂  体外研究  

Comparison of the incidences of apical root cracks after canal preparation with two nickel-titanium rotary systems:an in vitro study
CHEN Chen,LIANG Yu-hong,GAO Xue-jun. Comparison of the incidences of apical root cracks after canal preparation with two nickel-titanium rotary systems:an in vitro study[J]. Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2015, 47(1): 129-133. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2015.01.024
Authors:CHEN Chen  LIANG Yu-hong  GAO Xue-jun
Affiliation:(Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China)
Abstract:Objective: To compare the incidences of root cracks after canal instrumentation with HyFlex CM system and the ProTaper Universal system .Methods:Sixty mandibular incisors were mounted in resin blocks with simulated periodontal ligaments , and the apex was exposed .The control group of 20 teeth was not prepared , and the other 40 teeth were divided into 2 experimental groups ( n=20 ) .The 40 root canals of the experimental groups were instrumented using HyFlex CM and ProTaper Universal to the major apical foramen ( AF).The horizontal sections 1 mm, 2 mm, and 3 mm from the apex were observed under an optical stereomicroscope at 25 ×magnification .The presence of cracks was noted . Results:No cracks were found in the control teeth .Cracks were found in 1 of 20 ( 5%) teeth in HyFlex CM group , and 17 of 20 ( 85%) teeth in ProTaper Universal group .The difference between the two experimental groups was statistically significant (P<0.01).Conclusion: The HyFlex CM files caused fewer root cracks than the ProTaper Universal files during the root canal instrumentation .
Keywords:Root canal preparation  Root crack  In vitro
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京大学学报(医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京大学学报(医学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号