| 交锁髓内钉与单臂外固定支架治疗胫腓骨骨折疗效分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈坤峰. 交锁髓内钉与单臂外固定支架治疗胫腓骨骨折疗效分析[J]. 中国医药, 2008, 3(10): 623-624 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈坤峰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南省商丘市第一人民医院骨科,476100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的评价交锁髓内钉与单臂外固定支架治疗胫腓骨骨折的效果。方法胫腓骨骨折患者108例分别给予交锁髓内钉（交锁髓内钉组58例）和单臂外固定支架（单臂外固定支架组50例）治疗，对其疗效进行分析。结果单臂外固定支架组平均愈合时间为4个月，短于交锁髓内钉组（5个月）；交锁髓内钉组并发症发生率为18．9％，少于单臂外固定支架组（22．0％）。结论交锁髓内钉、单臂外固定支架治疗胫腓骨骨折各有优势。
|
| 关 键 词： | 胫腓骨骨折 交锁髓内钉 外固定支架 |
Comparison of interlocking intramedullary nail and external fixator for tibial fibular fracture |
| |
| CHEN Kun-feng. Comparison of interlocking intramedullary nail and external fixator for tibial fibular fracture[J]. China Medicine, 2008, 3(10): 623-624 |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Kun-feng |
| |
| Affiliation: | CHEN Kun-feng.( Department of Orthopedics , Shangqiu First People＇s Hospital ( Shangqiu 476100, China )) |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To investigate different effects of interlocking intramedullary nail and external fixator for treatment of tibial fibular fractures. Methods One hundred and eight patients were treated with either interlocking intreamedullary nail or external fixator. Results The mean healing time in the external fixator group was 5 months earlier than that in the interlocking intrameduUary nail group. The complications in the external fixator group was 18.9% ,less than the interlocking intramedullary nail group(22.0%). Conclusion Both interlocking intramedullary nail and external fixator are effective for treatment of tibial fibular fractures. |
| |
| Keywords: | Tibial fibular fracture Interlocking intramedullary nail External fixator |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
