Sonoelastography versus dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating BI-RADS III and IV breast masses

Background

Several clinical studies showed that sonoelastography was useful for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Contrast-enhanced MRI has emerged as a promising tool in the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer.

Aim of work

To study the role of sonoelastography versus dynamic MRI in evaluating BI-RADS III, IV breast masses and detect which modality is of better sensitivity and specificity trying to guide the patient either to follow-up the lesion or proceed to lesion excision.

Subjects and methods

The study included 50 Egyptian patients (age ranged from 32 to 58 years) who presented by breast masses and categorized as BI-RADS III, IV by mammography and ultrasound. Sonoelastography and dynamic MRI were done for all the patients.

Results

Differentiation between BI-RADS III and IV by US elastography had 84% sensitivity and 84% specificity and by MRI had 88% sensitivity and 80% specificity.

Conclusion

Regarding the sonoelastography, it is an easy and cheap modality. The elasticity score is an important parameter for lesion characterization. Combination of morphologic and dynamic MRI studies is very important for the breast lesion evaluation. MRI is more sensitive but less specific than sonoelastography. Finally if we find any suspicious character elicited by either sonoelastography or MRI (BI-RADS IV), lesion excision is recommended.