首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

乌灵胶囊和黛力新治疗广泛性焦虑症对照研究
引用本文:王瑛,张海音. 乌灵胶囊和黛力新治疗广泛性焦虑症对照研究[J]. 上海精神医学, 2005, 17(3): 158-159
作者姓名:王瑛  张海音
作者单位:200025,上海第二医科大学附属瑞金医院神经内科;上海市精神卫生中心
摘    要:目的观察乌灵胶囊对广泛性焦虑症的疗效与安全性。方法采用平行对照研究方法,治疗组30例患者给予口服乌灵胶囊3粒,3次/日;对照组30例患者给予口服黛力新1片,2次/日。于治疗前及治疗后第1周、2周、4周、6周分别以汉密顿焦虑量表(Hamilton Anxiety Scale,HAMA)、汉密顿抑郁量表(Hamilton Depression Scale,HAMD)、治疗时出现的症状量表(Treatment Emergent Symptoms.TESS)及实验室检查评估疗效与安全性。结果治疗组、对照组总有效率分别为73%、77%,二组之间疗效无显著差异。治疗组未见明显不良反应,对照组不良反应发生率为11%,主要为口干、过度镇静和头痛。结论乌灵胶囊是治疗广泛性焦虑症疗效可靠、安全的药物。

关 键 词:乌灵胶囊  黛力新  广泛性焦虑症

A paralleled compared study of Wuling capsule and Deanxit in the treatment of general anxiety disorder
Wang Ying,Zhang Haiyin. A paralleled compared study of Wuling capsule and Deanxit in the treatment of general anxiety disorder[J]. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 2005, 17(3): 158-159
Authors:Wang Ying  Zhang Haiyin
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of Wuling capsule compared with Deanxit in the treatment of general anxiety disorder(GAD). Methods: 60 patients met Chinese classification and diagnostic criteria of mental disorders, 3nd Rev Ed, criteria for GAD were assigned to Wuling capsule group (therapy group,n=30) and Deanxit group (controlled group,n= 30) for 6 weeks. Efficacy and side effects were evaluated with Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA ) , Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD) and Treatment Emergent Symptoms Scale(TESS) before treatment and 1,2,4,6 weeks after treatment. Results:There was no significant difference in response rate between the two groups(Wuling group:73%,Deanxit group:77%). There was no significant side effects of Wuling group.The incidence of side effects of Deanxit group was 11% .The main side effects were dry mouth, sedation and headache.Conclusion:Wuing capsule was effective and safe in the treatment of GAD .
Keywords:Wuling capsule Deanxit Generalized anxiety disorder
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号