首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


DNA transfer by examination tools – a risk for forensic casework?
Institution:1. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, Victoria 3216, Australia;2. Office of the Chief Forensic Scientist, Victoria Police Forensic Services Department, 31 Forensic Drive, Macleod, Victoria 3085, Australia;3. School of Psychological Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia;1. UCL Centre for the Forensic Sciences, 35 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK;2. UCL Department of Security and Crime Science, 35 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK;3. UCL Division of Biosciences, Medical Sciences Building, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK;4. Office of the Chief Forensic Scientist, Victoria Police Forensic Services Department, Melbourne, Australia;1. UCL Centre for the Forensic Sciences, 35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, UK;2. UCL Department of Security and Crime Science,35 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9EZ, UK;3. National Institute of Criminalistics, Federal Police, SAIS 7, Lote 23, Setor Policial Sul, 70610-200, Brasília, Brazil;1. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia;2. Office of the Chief Forensic Scientist, Victoria Police Forensic Services Department, Macleod, Victoria, Australia;3. School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
Abstract:The introduction of profiling systems with increased sensitivity has led to a concurrent increase in the risk of detecting contaminating DNA in forensic casework. To evaluate the contamination risk of tools used during exhibit examination we have assessed the occurrence and level of DNA transferred between mock casework exhibits, comprised of cotton or glass substrates, and high-risk vectors (scissors, forceps, and gloves). The subsequent impact of such transfer in the profiling of a target sample was also investigated. Dried blood or touch DNA, deposited on the primary substrate, was transferred via the vector to the secondary substrate, which was either DNA-free or contained a target sample (dried blood or touch DNA). Pairwise combinations of both heavy and light contact were applied by each vector in order to simulate various levels of contamination.The transfer of dried blood to DNA-free cotton was observed for all vectors and transfer scenarios, with transfer substantially lower when glass was the substrate. Overall touch DNA transferred less efficiently, with significantly lower transfer rates than blood when transferred to DNA-free cotton; the greatest transfer of touch DNA occurred between cotton and glass substrates. In the presence of a target sample, the detectability of transferred DNA decreased due to the presence of background DNA. Transfer had no impact on the detectability of the target profile, however, in casework scenarios where the suspect profiles are not known, profile interpretation becomes complicated by the addition of contaminating alleles and the probative value of the evidence may be affected. The results of this study reiterate the need for examiners to adhere to stringent laboratory cleaning protocols, particularly in the interest of contamination minimisation, and to reduce the handling of items to prevent intra-item transfer.
Keywords:Trace  DNA  Transfer  Contamination  Examination tools
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号