首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

大学生干眼症的流行病学调查及相关危险因素分析
引用本文:何玉萍,张文芳,律鹏,周然,夏锦涛,樊莹.大学生干眼症的流行病学调查及相关危险因素分析[J].国际眼科杂志,2016,16(6):1019-1025.
作者姓名:何玉萍  张文芳  律鹏  周然  夏锦涛  樊莹
作者单位:1. 200080,上海交通大学附属第一人民医院眼科;2. 730000甘肃省兰州大学附属兰州大学第二医院眼科
基金项目:兰州大学大学生创新创业行动计划科研项目
摘    要:目的:了解中国大学生干眼症患病状况,探讨干眼症发病的相关危险因素。方法:横断面研究方法。以兰州大学医学院所有在读学生作为研究对象,采用问卷调查方式对干眼症患病状况及相关危险因素进行调查。干眼症诊断采用六项问卷形式,以受检者经常或总是出现一个或一个以上症状作为干眼症的诊断标准。干眼症阳性体征包括泪膜破裂时间( TBUT)≤10 s以及单眼或双眼角膜染色( FSS )计分≥1。采用多因素logistic回归模型进行相关危险因素分析。结果:共1139名学生纳入本研究,应答率为84.37%,其中男生475名,女生664名,年龄16~26岁。干眼症的患病率为18.70%(95%CI=16.59~20.81),阳性体征中TBUT ≤10 s 的比例大约占47.67%(95%CI=44.95~50.57),FSS≥1占了13.97%(95%CI=11.95~15.99)。多因素 Logistic回归分析结果显示每日阅读时间≥4 h ( OR=1.58,95%CI=1.15~2.18)、每日电脑使用时间≥4h(OR=1.52,95%CI=1.02~2.25)以及长时间配戴眼镜( OR=1.54,95%CI=1.08~2.13)是干眼症发生的危险因素,不同性别、是否进行准分子手术、是否戴隐形眼镜之间干眼症患病率无显著性差异。结论:中国大学生干眼症患病率较高,主要的危险因素包括每日阅读时间和电脑使用时间超过4h,以及长时间配戴眼镜。

关 键 词:大学生  干眼  患病率  危险因素  症状
收稿时间:2015/12/12 0:00:00
修稿时间:4/4/2016 12:00:00 AM

Prevalence of symptomatic dry eye disease among Chinese college students with associated risk factors
Institution:Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China;Department of Ophthalmology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China;Department of Ophthalmology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China;Department of Ophthalmology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China;Department of Ophthalmology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China;Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
Abstract:Abstract?AIM: To obtain the prevalence and risk factors of symptomatic dry eye disease ( SDED ) among college students in China.?METHODS:Population-based cross-sectional study. Students in Medical School of Lanzhou University were approached. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the prevalence of SDED and its risk factors. The diagnosis of SDED was based on reported symptoms and was established if the participants reported “often” or “all the time” once or more for 6-item questionnaire. Positive tests included a tear-film breakup time ( TBUT)≤10s and a fluorescein staining score ( FSS ) ≥1. Demographic information and possible factors that may contribute to SDED were analyzed in a step-wise multivariate logistic regression modelto assess risk factors of SDED.? RESULTS: There were 1139 participants ( 84. 37%response rate ) have completed the questionnaire, 475 males and 664 females aged 16-26y. The prevalence of SDED was 18. 70% 95% confidence interval ( CI)= 16. 59-20. 81]. A TBUT of ≤10s and a FSS≥1 were noted in 47. 67%(95% CI=44. 95-50. 57) and 13. 97%(95% CI=11. 95-15. 99) for all participants, respectively. The multivariate regression analysis revealed the following risk factors:daily reading time of≥4h(OR=1. 58,95% CI=1. 15-2. 18), daily computer use of≥4h ( OR= 1. 52, 95% CI= 1. 02-2. 25), and constant eyeglasses wearing (OR=1. 54,95%CI=1. 08-2. 13). The female gender, refractive surgery and contact lens ( CLs) wearing were not risk factors for SDED in this analysis.? CONCLUSION: The prevalence for SDED is high in Chinese college students. The risk factors include daily reading time of≥4h, daily computer use of≥4h and constant eyeglasses wearing.
Keywords:college student  dry eye disease  prevalence  risk factor  symptom
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际眼科杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号