| 两种植皮方式治疗大面积深度烧伤患者的经济学评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 林才,陈更新,张鹏,卢才教,徐建军,罗旭,刘政军. 两种植皮方式治疗大面积深度烧伤患者的经济学评价[J]. 中华烧伤杂志, 2009, 25(4): 286-288. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2009.04.019 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 林才 陈更新 张鹏 卢才教 徐建军 罗旭 刘政军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 华南理工大学材料科学与工程学院,510641
2. 浙江温州医学院附属第一医院烧伤科,325000 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 浙江省科技计划项目，温州市科技计划项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | Objective To evaluate the economic significance of Meek skin grafting and automicro-grafting combined with large piece of allogenous skin (micrografting in brief) in the treatment of patients with extensive deep burn. Methods Twenty-four patients with extensive deep burn admitted to the First Affili-ated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College were divided into Meek skin grafting group and micrografting group, with 12 patients in each group. Statistical comparison between Meek skin grafting group and micro-grafting group in respect of wound healing time, consumption of each special dressing , total cost of hospitali-zation, rehabilitation cost during convalescence was made. Then the cost and effect value was compared be-tween two groups. Results The wound healing time, consumption of each special dressing, total cost of hospitalization and rehabilitation cost in Meek skin grafting group was (14.4±1.9) d, ￥(16 590±521) , ￥(421 628 ± 145) , ￥(39 571±225) , respectively, and that in micrografting group was (25.6±4.2)d, ￥(136 441±356), ￥(539 526±686), ￥(55 853±794) , respectively. The difference between two groups were statistically significant (P<0.01 ). Conclusions In a definite range of burn size, Meek skin grafting has a lower therapeutic cost and better therapeutic effects as compared with micrografiing.
|
| 关 键 词： | 烧伤 微粒皮 Meek植皮 经济学评价 |
Comparison of cost between two ways of skin grafting in the treatment of patients with extensive deep burn |
| |
| LIN Cai,CHEN Geng-xin,ZHANG Peng,LU Cai-jiao,XU Jian-jun,LUO Xu,LIU Zheng-jun. Comparison of cost between two ways of skin grafting in the treatment of patients with extensive deep burn[J]. Chinese journal of burns, 2009, 25(4): 286-288. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2009.04.019 |
| |
| Authors: | LIN Cai CHEN Geng-xin ZHANG Peng LU Cai-jiao XU Jian-jun LUO Xu LIU Zheng-jun |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To evaluate the economic significance of Meek skin grafting and automicro-grafting combined with large piece of allogenous skin (micrografting in brief) in the treatment of patients with extensive deep burn. Methods Twenty-four patients with extensive deep burn admitted to the First Affili-ated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College were divided into Meek skin grafting group and micrografting group, with 12 patients in each group. Statistical comparison between Meek skin grafting group and micro-grafting group in respect of wound healing time, consumption of each special dressing , total cost of hospitali-zation, rehabilitation cost during convalescence was made. Then the cost and effect value was compared be-tween two groups. Results The wound healing time, consumption of each special dressing, total cost of hospitalization and rehabilitation cost in Meek skin grafting group was (14.4±1.9) d, ￥(16 590±521) , ￥(421 628 ± 145) , ￥(39 571±225) , respectively, and that in micrografting group was (25.6±4.2)d, ￥(136 441±356), ￥(539 526±686), ￥(55 853±794) , respectively. The difference between two groups were statistically significant (P<0.01 ). Conclusions In a definite range of burn size, Meek skin grafting has a lower therapeutic cost and better therapeutic effects as compared with micrografiing. |
| |
| Keywords: | BurnsMicroskinMeek skin graftingEconomic evaluation |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
