2005年白银市传染病疫情网络直报信息质量评价

目的 了解白银市传染病网络直报工作状况,探讨直报信息质量网上评价方法,有效指导基层单位工作.方法 从《疾病监测信息报告管理系统》中获取白银市传染病网络直报数据库资料,以《传染病防治法》及有关规范为依据,按医疗机构、疾控机构不同职责,统一评价方法与标准,采用SPSS软件对直报数据进行统计处理.结果 全市网络直报覆盖率70.27%;医疗机构零缺报率3.03%,网络信息重复报告率7.67%;传染病诊断到直报7.05d,比2004年缩短5.35d,报告及时率63.27%;报告到审核5.38 h,审核率100.00%,审核及时率95.47%;报告到重卡删除51.19d,及时查重率22.24%.结论 网络直报模式的建立提高了传染病报告的时效性,但是,报告及时率低、重报率高等问题仍然突出,应进一步探讨直报信息质量网上评价方法,针对不同问题,有效加以解决.

Evaluation on the information quality of direct network report of infectious diseases in Baiyin City in 2005

Objective The study was conducted to investigate the performance of direct network reporting of infectious diseases, discuss the methods of online evaluation on the quality of directly reported information, and effectively direct the work of Grassroots units. Methods The data of infectious disease direct network report database in Baiyin City was obtained from Disease Surveillance Information Report and Management System. Directly reported data was conducted with SPSS software, and the methods and criteria of evaluation were uniformed based on the different duties of medical institutions and organizations for disease control and prevention in accordance with law on the prevention and control of infectious diseases and related rules. Results The coverage of direct network report reached 70.27% in Baiyin City. The zero failure report rate was 3.03% in medical institutions. The repeated report rate of network information was 7.67%. It took 7.05 days averagely to report infectious diseases after diagnosis, which was 5.35 days shorter compared with 2004. The timeliness rate of report was 63.27%. It took 5.38 hours from report to verification, the verified rate was 100.00%, and the timeliness rate of verification was 95.47%. It took 51.19 days from report to deletion of repeated cards, and the timeliness rate of checking repeated cards was 22.24%. Conclusion The establishment of the mode of Direct Network Report has greatly improved the timeliness of infectious disease report. But there were still prominent problems, such as low timeliness rate of report, and high repeated report rate, etc. Methods of online evaluation on the quality of directly reported information should be further discussed to solve different problems effectively.