首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

洛美沙星片剂随机对照治疗急性细菌性感染的临床评价
引用本文:吕媛,李家泰.洛美沙星片剂随机对照治疗急性细菌性感染的临床评价[J].中国药学杂志,1997,32(10):616-619.
作者姓名:吕媛  李家泰
作者单位:北京医科大学第一医院临床药理研究所
摘    要: 目的:评价国产洛美沙星(lomefloxacin)治疗细菌性感染的有效性和安全性。方法:随机对照开放试验。结果:随机对照组76例,用氧氟沙星(ofloxacin)对照,其中两组痊愈率和有效率分别是66.7%,64.9%和89.7%,89.2%;细菌阳性率是82.1%与86.5%;细菌清除率是90.6%和93.8%;不良反应发生率是5.1%和5.4%。以上结果经统计学处理,无显著差异(P>0.05)。开放试验组80例,其痊愈率和有效率分别是67.5%与86.3%;细菌阳性率是85%;细菌清除率88.2%。不良反应发生率5.0%。全部临床分离菌株纸片法药敏试验及MIC结果表明两药作用相似,但明显优于氨苄青霉素、头孢拉定和庆大霉素。结论:洛美沙星可作为临床上常见致病菌所致感染的选择用药。

关 键 词:洛美沙星  氧氟沙星  随机对照  临床试验
收稿时间:1996-11-07;

A randomized controlled clinical study of lomefloxacin
Lü Yuan.A randomized controlled clinical study of lomefloxacin[J].Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal,1997,32(10):616-619.
Authors:Lü Yuan
Institution:(Ly Y),Li Jiatai(Li JT),Gao Lei(Gao L),et a
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lomefloxacin in the treatment of bacterial infections. METHOD: A randomized controlled opend clinical trial. RESULTS: In the randomized controlled group, the overall clinical efficacy rates of lomefloxacin and ofloxacin were 89.7% and 89.2% respectively, the bacteriological response rates were 90.6% and 93.8% respectively, and the rates of adverse drug reaction of the two groups were 5.1% and 5.4% respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups. In the open group, the clinical efficacy rate, the bacterialogical clearance rate, and the rate of adverse drug reaction of lomefloxacin was 86.3%, 88.2% and 5.0% respectively. The susceptibility rates of the bacteria isolated to lomefloxacin and ofloxacin were similar. CONCLUSION: Lomefloxacin is highly effective and well tolerated.
Keywords:lomefloxacin  ofloxacin  randomized controlled  clinical trial  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国药学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国药学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号