首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for high risk patients With severe aortic stenosis using the Edwards Sapien balloon‐expandable bioprosthesis: A single centre study with immediate and medium‐term outcomes
Authors:Mark D. Osten MD  Christopher Feindel MDCM  Matthias Greutmann MD  Kristeen Chamberlain BScN  Massimiliano Meineri MD  Barry Rubin MDCM  PhD  Melitta Mezody MD  Joan Ivanov PhD  Jagdish Butany MD  Eric M. Horlick MDCM
Affiliation:1. Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;2. Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery and Vascular Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;3. Department of Anaesthesia, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;4. Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Abstract:Background : Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TCAVI) is an emerging alternative therapy to open‐heart surgery in high‐risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Methods : Between January 2007 and May 2009, 46 patients underwent TCAVI with the 23 mm or 26 mm Edwards Sapien bioprosthesis via either the transapical (TA‐AVI) or transfemoral (TF‐AVI) approach. All patients had an estimated operative mortality risk of >15%. Results : A total of 46 patients (30 TA‐AVI, 16 TF‐AVI) with a mean aortic valve area (AVA) of 0.63 ± 0.2 cm2 and mean gradient of 54 ± 16 mm Hg were treated. Predicted operative mortality was 25.3% by logistic Euroscore and 8.7% by Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score. Procedural success was 93% in the TA‐AVI group and 88% in the TF‐AVI group. There was one intraprocedural death in the TA‐AVI group. Overall 30‐day mortality was 6.5% (2‐TA‐AVI, 1‐TF‐AVI). Four patients (9.5%) died from noncardiac causes after 30 days. Successful TCAVI was associated with a significant increase in AVA from 0.6 ± 0.1 cm2 to 1.6 ± 0.6 cm2 in the TA‐AVI group and 0.6 ± 0.1 cm2 to 1.4 ± 0.2 cm2 in the TF‐AVI group at a mean follow up of 7.4 ± 4.4 and 8.3 ± 5.0 months, respectively. At discharge, there was significant improvement in AVA (P < 0.0001), transaortic mean gradient (P < 0.0001), and mitral regurgitation (P = 0.01). At medium term follow up, the valve area was maintained and there was significant improvement in NYHA class in both groups (P < 0.0001). Conclusion : At medium term follow‐up, both transcatheter approaches demonstrated good valve durability with no cardiac‐related mortality post hospital discharge. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Keywords:transcatheter  aortic valve  transapical  transfemoral  aortic stenosis
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号