首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

三种腋臭治疗方法的临床观察
引用本文:陈杰,刘大忠. 三种腋臭治疗方法的临床观察[J]. 四川医学, 2011, 32(4): 547-549
作者姓名:陈杰  刘大忠
作者单位:成都市新都区人民医院康复科,四川,成都,610500
摘    要:目的探讨治疗腋臭的较佳模式。方法随机分组分别采用顺皮纹小切口综合术式(A组)、单纯切除加修剪法(B组)、CO2激光烧灼治疗(C组),观察3种方法治疗腋臭的痊愈率、有效率及并发症的发生率。结果 A组与B组治愈率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),A组与C组治愈率差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),B组与C组治愈率差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。在术后皮下血肿、皮肤坏死、疤痕等并发症方面A组明显优于B组和C组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论顺皮纹小切口综合术式A组治疗腋臭是较好的方法。

关 键 词:腋臭  顺皮纹小切口综合术式  单纯切除加修剪法  CO2激光烧灼治疗

The clinical observation of three treatment with underarm odor
CHEN Jie,LIU Da-zhong. The clinical observation of three treatment with underarm odor[J]. Sichuan Medical Journal, 2011, 32(4): 547-549
Authors:CHEN Jie  LIU Da-zhong
Affiliation:.The People′s Hospital of Xindu,Chengdu,Sichuan 610500,China
Abstract:Objective To investigate a better mode of treatment of axillary osmidrosis.Methods A random group were used by complex surging with super thin flap min-incision(A group),or simple cutting and pruning method(B group),or treating by CO2 laser(C group),to observe the cure rate in an efficient and the incidence of complication in three methods of treatment of axillary osmidrosis.Results A group and B group was no significant difference in cure rates(P0.05),A group and C group there was significant difference in cure rates(P0.05),B group and C group there was significant difference in cure rates(P0.05).In the postoperative subcutaneous hematonma、skin necrosis、 scar and other complications,A group was significantly better than the B group and C group,there was statistical significant(P 0.05).Conclusion Complex surging axillary osmidrosis with super thin flap min-incision(A group) is a better approach.
Keywords:axillary osmidrosis  complex surging with super thin flap min-incision  simple cutting and pruning method  treating by CO2 laser
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号