Where is the noise in sdt pain assessment? |
| |
Authors: | Richard Coppola Richard H. Gracely |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Laboratory of Psychology and Psychopathology, National Institute of Mental Health,Bethesda, Md. 20205 USA;7. Neurobiology and Anesthesiology Branch, National Institute of Dental Research, Bethesda, Md. 20205 U.S.A. |
| |
Abstract: | Many applications of sensory decision theory (SDT) to pain research have used discrimination as a measure of pain or sensory sensitivity. This belief is based on the classical SDT assumption that discrimination and criterion represent separation of sensory and decision processes. This assumed separation stems from a model where all noise or variability is part of the sensory transduction mechanism. We present an alternative formulation that allows for decision variability as well as variability in sensory transduction. This formulation documented by computer simulation shows that decision variability and sensory variability are indistinguishable and that any measure of discriminability is degraded by both. Thus discriminability is influenced by both sensory and non-sensory factors. There is no way of knowing if a drug-induced change in discriminability represents an analgesic effect or a change of the observer's ability to make consistent judgments. |
| |
Keywords: | Address correspondence to Dr. R. Coppola NIMH Laboratory of Psychology and Psychopathology Bldg. 10 Room 4C218 Bethesda Md. 20205 U.S.A.. |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |