留守流动儿童与城乡儿童的行为问题比较

目的比较留守儿童、流动儿童与城乡儿童行为问题的差异,为其干预研究提供参考依据。方法分层整群抽取广西8所农村小学和3所城郊结合部小学3~6年级学生2499人,采用自编问卷和Rutter儿童行为问卷(教师版)进行现场调查。结果儿童行为问题阳性率18.29%,"N行为""A行为""M行为",男童行为问题阳性率均显著高于女童(χ2=41.468,P0.05),男女儿童均以"N行为"为主。农村非留守组儿童行为问题阳性率最低(9.55%),且与农村留守组(18.45%)、城市流动组(22.82%)、城市非流动组(24.58%)差异显著(χ2=16.012,40.654,72.451;P0.001)。结论农村非留守儿童行为问题低于留守儿童,城市流动儿童与非流动儿童行为问题差异不显著;男童行为问题明显高于女童。

Left-behind Children,Migrant Children,Rural and Urban Children Behavioral Problems

Objective To compare differences in child behavior problems between left-behind children, migrant children, rural and urban children, and provide reference for the intervention study. Methods A total of 2499 three to six students from Guangxi eight rural primary and three suburban elementary grades were included by stratified cluster sampling and conducted on-site investigation by using a self-designed questionnaire and Rutter Children Behavior Questionnaire （teachers）. Results The positive rate of child behavior problems was 18.29% ,＂ N behavior,＂ 〉 ＂A behavior＂ 〉 ＂M behavior,＂ and boys were significantly higher than girls（ X2 = 41. 468 ,P 〈 0.05 ）. The main behavior problems of girls and boys were ＂N behavior＂. The positive rate of behavioral problems of non left-behind children in rural was the lowest （9.55%） , which was significantly lower than those of other children （the rural left-behind group 18.45% , urban mobility group 22.82% ,urban non-current group 24.58% ） （ x2 = 16. 012,40. 654,72. 451 ,P 〈 0. 001 ）. Conclusion The rural non left-behind children＂ behavior problems is lower than that of left-behind children, there are no significant difference in behavior problem between migrant children in city and non migrant children. Boys＇behavior problems are significantly higher than girls.