首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

2014年宁夏地区放射诊疗机构辐射防护监测结果分析
引用本文:李鸿成,卢桂才,孔庆宇,姬绪莉,孙彦玲. 2014年宁夏地区放射诊疗机构辐射防护监测结果分析[J]. 中华放射医学与防护杂志, 2016, 36(1): 55-57
作者姓名:李鸿成  卢桂才  孔庆宇  姬绪莉  孙彦玲
作者单位:750001 银川, 宁夏疾病预防控制中心放射卫生科,750001 银川, 宁夏疾病预防控制中心放射卫生科,750001 银川, 宁夏疾病预防控制中心放射卫生科,750001 银川, 宁夏疾病预防控制中心放射卫生科,750001 银川, 宁夏疾病预防控制中心放射卫生科
基金项目:宁夏留学人员创新创业项目(2013)
摘    要:目的 比较容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)及体型特异性剂量估算(SSDE)在估算腹部CT扫描时患者所受辐射剂量的差异。方法 采用Philips 256螺旋CT扫描仪对180例患者进行上腹部CT增强扫描,在左肾静脉主干层面测量每位患者的左右径(LAT)、前后径(AP),计算有效直径(ED),同时记录每位被检者的CTDIvol值及体模的扫描直径,计算SSDE。将患者按照体重指数(BMI)分为3组:A组,BMI<20 kg/m2;B组,BMI介于20~24.9 kg/m2之间;C组,BMI>24.9 kg/m2。分别比较180例被检者及不同体重指数组CTDIvol与SSDE之间的差异。结果 180例被检者CTDIvol和SSDE分别为(9.91±2.91)和(14.01±2.82)mGy,差异有统计学意义(t=-13.354,P=0.000)。A组CTDIvol和SSDE分别为(7.96±1.83)和(12.83±2.52)mGy ( t=-8.417,P =0.000);B组分别为(9.28±1.76)和(13.62±2.18)mGy(t=-15.051,P=0.000);C组分别为(12.19±3.65)和(15.39±3.47)mGy(t=-4.535,P=0.000)。此外,3组SSDE分别较CTDIvol平均增加了62.83%、 47.80%和28.40%,即CTDIvol过低估算被检者的辐射剂量,且随着体重指数的增加,CTDIvol与SSDE之间的差值越小。结论 SSDE能够反映特定体型的被检者进行腹部CT扫描时所接受的辐射剂量。

关 键 词:容积CT剂量指数  体型特异性剂量评估  辐射剂量
收稿时间:2015-05-18

Analysis on monitoring results of radiation protection in radiation medical institutions of Ningxia region in 2014
Li Hongcheng,Lu Guicai,Kong Qingyu,Ji Xuli and Sun Yanling. Analysis on monitoring results of radiation protection in radiation medical institutions of Ningxia region in 2014[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection, 2016, 36(1): 55-57
Authors:Li Hongcheng  Lu Guicai  Kong Qingyu  Ji Xuli  Sun Yanling
Affiliation:Radiological Health Department, Ningxia Centers for Diseases Prevention Control, Yinchuan 750001, China,Radiological Health Department, Ningxia Centers for Diseases Prevention Control, Yinchuan 750001, China,Radiological Health Department, Ningxia Centers for Diseases Prevention Control, Yinchuan 750001, China,Radiological Health Department, Ningxia Centers for Diseases Prevention Control, Yinchuan 750001, China and Radiological Health Department, Ningxia Centers for Diseases Prevention Control, Yinchuan 750001, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the difference between volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in evaluating the radiation dose of abdominal CT scan. Methods Abdominal CT scan were performed on 180 consecutive patients with a 256-slice MDCT. The anterior-posterior dimension (AP) and lateral dimension (LAT) of each patients were measured at the level of left renal vein, and the effective diameter (ED) and SSDE were calculated with recorded CTDIvol Patients were categorized into 3 groups depend on BMI: Group A, BMI<20 kg/m2; Group B,20-24.9 kg/m2; Group C, BMI>24.9 kg/m2. The differences between CTDIvol and SSDE of 180 patients and three different BMI groups were compared respectively. Results There was a significant difference between CTDIvol and SSDE of those 180 patients (t=-13.354, P=0.000), CTDIvol and SSDE were (9.91±2.91) and (14.01±2.82) mGy respectively. For Group A, CTDIvol and SSDE were (7.96±1.83) and (12.83±2.52) mGy respectively (t=-8.417, P=0.000); Group B, CTDIvol and SSDE were (9.28±1.76) and (13.62±2.18) mGy respectively (t=-15.051, P=0.000); Group C, CTDIvol and SSDE were (12.19±3.65) and (15.39±3.47) mGy respectively (t=-4.535, P=0.000). Besides, the mean percentage values of difference between CTDIvol and SSDE for three group was 62.83%, 47.80%, 28.40%, respectively, which means CTDIvol underestimates the radition dose compared to SSDE. With the BMI increasing, the values of difference between CTDIvol and SSDE decreased. Conclusions SSDE can be used to estimate the radiation dose of abdominal CT scan for a given size person.
Keywords:CTDIvol  Size-specific dose estimate  Radiation dose
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号