| 对比分析容积CT剂量指数与体型特异性的剂量评估在估算腹部CT扫描辐射剂量中的差异 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 袁肖娜,高知玲,马文东,周娣,王海燕,陈宇欣,陈勇.对比分析容积CT剂量指数与体型特异性的剂量评估在估算腹部CT扫描辐射剂量中的差异[J].中华放射医学与防护杂志,2016,36(1):74-77. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 袁肖娜 高知玲 马文东 周娣 王海燕 陈宇欣 陈勇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 750004 银川, 宁夏医科大学临床医学院,750004 银川, 宁夏医科大学总医院放射科,750004 银川, 宁夏医科大学总医院放射科,750004 银川, 宁夏医科大学临床医学院,750004 银川, 宁夏医科大学临床医学院,550025 贵阳, 贵州医科大学医学影像学院,750004 银川, 宁夏医科大学总医院放射科 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 宁夏留学人员创新创业项目(2013) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 比较容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)及体型特异性剂量评估(SSDE)在估算腹部CT扫描时患者所受辐射剂量的差异。方法 采用Philips 256螺旋CT扫描仪对180例患者进行上腹部CT增强扫描,在左肾静脉主干层面测量每例患者的左右径(LAT)、前后径(AP),计算有效直径(ED),同时记录每例被检者的CTDIvol值及体模的扫描直径,计算SSDE。将患者按照体质量指数(BMI)分为3组:A组,BMI<20.0 kg/m2;B组,BMI介于20.0~24.9 kg/m2之间;C组,BMI>24.9 kg/m2。分别比较180例被检者及不同体质量指数组CTDIvol与SSDE之间的差异。结果180例被检者CTDIvol和SSDE分别为(9.91±2.91)和(14.01±2.82)mGy,差异有统计学意义(t=-13.354, P<0.01)。A组CTDIvol和SSDE分别为(7.96±1.83)和(12.83±2.52)mGy (t=-8.417, P<0.01);B组分别为(9.28±1.76)和(13.62±2.18)mGy(t=-15.051,P<0.01);C组分别为(12.19±3.65)和(15.39±3.47)mGy(t=-4.535,P<0.01)。此外,3组SSDE分别较CTDIvol平均增加了62.83%、 47.80%和28.40%,即CTDIvol过低估算被检者的辐射剂量,且随着体质量指数的增加,CTDIvol与SSDE之间的差值越小。结论 SSDE能够反映特定体型的被检者进行腹部CT扫描时所接受的辐射剂量。
|
| 关 键 词： | 容积CT剂量指数 体型特异性剂量评估 辐射剂量 |
| 收稿时间： | 2015/6/17 0:00:00 |
Comparison of CTDIvol and SSDE in evaluating the radiation dose of abdominal CT scan |
| |
| Yuan Xiaon,Gao Zhiling,Ma Wendong,Zhou Di,Wang Haiyan,Chen Yuxin and Chen Yong.Comparison of CTDIvol and SSDE in evaluating the radiation dose of abdominal CT scan[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection,2016,36(1):74-77. |
| |
| Authors: | Yuan Xiaon Gao Zhiling Ma Wendong Zhou Di Wang Haiyan Chen Yuxin and Chen Yong |
| |
| Institution: | Clinical Medicine School of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China,Department of Radiology, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China,Department of Radiology, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China,Clinical Medicine School of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China,Clinical Medicine School of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China,Medical Imaging Collage of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550025, China and Department of Radiology, The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To compare the difference between volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in evaluating the radiation dose of abdominal CT scan. Methods Abdominal CT scan were performed on 180 patients with a Philips 256-slices spiral CT. The anterior-posterior dimension (AP) and lateral dimension (LAT) of each patients were measured at the level of left renal vein, and the effective diameter (ED) and SSDE were calculated with recorded CTDIvol Patients were categorized into 3 groups depending on body mass index(BMI): group A, BMI<20.0 kg/m2; group B, 20.0-24.9 kg/m2; group C, BMI>24.9 kg/m2. The differences between CTDIvol and SSDE of 180 patients and three different BMI groups were compared respectively. ResultsThere was a significant difference between CTDIvol and SSDE of the 180 patients (t=-13.354, P<0.01), CTDIvol and SSDE were (9.91±2.91) and (14.01±2.82) mGy, respectively. For group A, CTDIvol and SSDE were (7.96±1.83) and (12.83±2.52) mGy, respectively (t=-8.417, P<0.01). Group B, CTDIvol and SSDE were (9.28±1.76) and (13.62±2.18) mGy, respectively (t=-15.051, P<0.01). Group C, CTDIvol and SSDE were (12.19±3.65) and (15.39±3.47) mGy, respectively (t=-4.535, P<0.01). In addition, the mean percentage values of difference between CTDIvol and SSDE for the three groups were 62.83%, 47.80%, 28.40%, respectively, which meant CTDIvol underestimated the radiation dose compared to SSDE. With the BMI increasing, the values of difference between CTDIvol and SSDE decreased. Conclusions SSDE can be used to estimate the radiation dose of abdominal CT scan for a given size person. |
| |
| Keywords: | CTDIvol Size-specific dose estimates Radiation dose |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中华放射医学与防护杂志》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
