首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

正畸微种植体治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类错(牙合)的临床疗效评价
引用本文:李大建,陈 华,龚犁玲. 正畸微种植体治疗安氏Ⅱ类1分类错(牙合)的临床疗效评价[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2013, 6(2): 130-133
作者姓名:李大建  陈 华  龚犁玲
作者单位:桂林市口腔医院正畸科,广西541001
摘    要:目的探讨微种植体在安氏Ⅱ类1分类错殆矫治中的应用效果,为临床推广使用微种植体提供理论依据。方法选取安氏Ⅱ类1分类错骀患者64例,其中男性32例,女性32例,年龄(22.78±3.26)岁。患者随机分为对照组和实验组,对照组采用口外J钩进行矫治,实验组采用微型种植体支抗进行矫治,治疗结束后,分析两组治疗前后头影和模型测量指标的变化。结果头影测量结果显示两组矫治后的ANB、Ls.E、L1-NB、Li—E、UI-SN、UI-L1、U1-MP、U1-NA和SNA等指标较矫治前均显著减小(P〈0.05或〈0.01),而u6-PP较矫治前显著增大(P〈0.05);实验组矫治后的ANB、Ls.E、Li-E、UI.SN、U1-L1、U1.NA、U6-PP和SNA等指标均优于对照组(P〈0.05)。对照组治疗疗程为(18±2)个月,实验组治疗疗程为(12-4-2)个月,实验组显著短于对照组(P〈0.05)。两组矫治后覆盖(OJ)和覆黯(OB)均较矫治前显著减小(P〈0.01),实验组OJ和OB均优于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论微种植体能够有效矫治安氏Ⅱ类1分类错骀。

关 键 词:微种植体  安氏Ⅱ类1分类  正畸
收稿时间:2012-09-05

Clinical effect evaluation of micro-implant in the treatment of Angle Class II division I malocclusion
LI Da-jian,CHEN Hu,GONG Li-ling. Clinical effect evaluation of micro-implant in the treatment of Angle Class II division I malocclusion[J]. Chinese Journal of New Clinical Medicine, 2013, 6(2): 130-133
Authors:LI Da-jian  CHEN Hu  GONG Li-ling
Affiliation:. Department of Orthodontic Division, Guilin Stomatological Hospital, Guangxi 541001, China
Abstract:Objective To investigated the effect of micro-implant in the treatment of Angle Class H division 1 classification and provide a theoretical basis for clinical promotion of the use of micro- implant. Methods Sixty- four patients with Angle Class H Division 1 Malocclusion, 32women and 32 men, with average age of (22.78 ± 3.26) years old, were randomly divided into control and experimental groups. In the control group, the patients treated with J hook,in the experimental group, the patients treated with micro-implant, before and after treatment, the change of cephalometric and model indexs were measured and analyzed. Results Two groups could take the correction of Angle Class H division 1 malocclusion, but in the experimental group ANB Ls-E, U1-L1, U1-MP, U1-NA, U6-PP, the SNA indicators more well than those in the control group (P 〈 0.05 or 〈 0. 01 ). The control group treatment course was (18 -+ 2 )months, the experimental groups treatment course of (12 ± 2)months, in the experimental group was significantly reduced treatment time(P 〈 0. 05 ). In the index of OJ and OB, the experimental group was better than the control group(P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Micro-implant treatment could corrected Angle Class 11 Division 1 Malocclusion well.
Keywords:Micro-implant  Angle Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion  Orthodontics
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国临床新医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国临床新医学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号