情绪调节认知策略在大学生神经质人格与抑郁关系的调节效应

目的 了解情绪调节认知策略在大学生神经质人格与抑郁症状关系中的调节效应.方法 对824名在校大学生开展问卷调查,采取多层次回归分析对数据进行分析.结果 在大学生所使用的认知情绪调节策略中,理性分析得分最高（14.1±2.57）分],灾难化得分最低（7.74±2.76）分].在控制了第一次抑郁得分后,神经质在抑郁上的标准回归系数（β=0.137,P＜0.001）、情绪调节策略中的积极重新关注在抑郁上的标准回归系数（β=-0.073,P＜0.05）以及沉思、灾难化在抑郁上的标准回归系数（β=0.137,P＜0.001;β=0.143,P＜0.01）均达到显著水平;抑郁与灾难化和责怪他人存在交互作用（β=0.0535,-0.620,P＜0.05,0.01）.结论 灾难化正向调节神经质人格对抑郁的影响,而责怪他人则负向调节神经质人格对抑郁的影响.

The moderating effect of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies on the relationship between neuroticism and depression in college students

Objective To examine the moderating effects of cognitive emotion regulation strategies on neuroticism and depression in college students.Methods Correlation and Hierarchical Regression Analysis were used to analyze the surveyed data collected from 824 college students.Results Among all the cognitive emotion regulation strategies,college students used the rational analysis most frequently （14.1 ± 2.57） and used the catastrophizing least frequently（7.74±2.76）.After controlling the effects of depressive symptoms at T1,the standard regression coefficients of neuroticism to depression were significant （β=0.137,P＜0.001）.The standard regression coefficients of positive refocusing to depression （β=-0.073,P＜0.05） and the standard regression coefficients of rumination and catastrophizing to depression were all significant（β=0.137,P＜0.001 ; β=0.143,P＜0.01）.The interaction between neuroticism and catastrophizing were significant （β=0.0535,P＜0.05）,whereas the interaction between neuroticism and blaming others were significant（β=-0.620,P＜0.01）.Conclusion Catastrophizing positively moderates the effects of neuroticism on depression,while blaming others negatively moderates the effects of neuroticism on depression.