首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

SPECT/CT骨显像对肺癌骨转移诊断的增益价值
引用本文:张一秋,石洪成,顾宇参,陈曙光,修雁,李蓓蕾,朱玮珉,余浩军.SPECT/CT骨显像对肺癌骨转移诊断的增益价值[J].中华核医学杂志,2011,31(4):219-222.
作者姓名:张一秋  石洪成  顾宇参  陈曙光  修雁  李蓓蕾  朱玮珉  余浩军
作者单位:复旦大学附属中山医院核医学科,上海,200032
摘    要:目的探讨SPECT/CT骨显像在肺癌骨转移诊断中的增益价值。方法146例病理证实为肺癌的患者,静脉注射^99Tc^m-MDP1110MBq,3~6h后按常规方法行全身骨显像。由1位资深核医学科医师分析全身骨显像图像后,决定是否行SPECT/CT显像以及显像视野范围,然后采集SPECT和CT图像。由2位核医学科医师先对全身骨显像的平面图像进行分析,然后分析SPECT/CT融合图像并诊断,诊断分为肿瘤骨转移、无肿瘤骨转移和不能确定。根据术后病理或随访获得正确诊断,分别计算全身骨显像、SPECT/CT融合图像对患者能正确(肿瘤骨转移和无肿瘤骨转移)诊断和不能正确诊断(不能确定和诊断错误)的百分率及其95%可信区间,并分别计算其诊断与最终诊断的符合率及其95%可信区间。全身骨显像和SPECT/CT能否正确诊断的百分率比较采用,检验。结果全身骨显像正确诊断者65例,占44.5%(65/146);不能正确诊断者81例,占55.5%(81/146),其95%可信区间为47.4%一63.5%;骨转移诊断的符合率为64.4%(29/45)。SPECT/CT融合图像能正确诊断者131例,占89.7%(131/146);不能正确诊断者15例,占10.3%(15/146),其95%可信区间为5.3%~15.2%;骨转移诊断的符合率为93.3%(42/45)。SPECT/CT融合图像的明确诊断率高于全身骨显像(χ2=69.598,P〈0.05)。结论SPECT/CT骨显像在肺癌骨转移诊断中较全身骨显像有增益价值,可以提供更多的诊断信息。

关 键 词:肺肿瘤  肿瘤转移  骨骼  放射性核素显像  体层摄影术  发射型计算机  单光子  体层摄影术,X线计算机  MDP

The added diagnostic value of SPECT/CT imaging for bone metastases from lung cancer
ZHANG Yi-qiu,SHI Hong-cheng,GU Yu-shen,CHEN Shu-guang,XIU Yan,LI Bei-lei,ZHU Wei-min,YU Hao-jun.The added diagnostic value of SPECT/CT imaging for bone metastases from lung cancer[J].Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine,2011,31(4):219-222.
Authors:ZHANG Yi-qiu  SHI Hong-cheng  GU Yu-shen  CHEN Shu-guang  XIU Yan  LI Bei-lei  ZHU Wei-min  YU Hao-jun
Institution:ZHANG Yi-qiu, SHI Hong-cheug, GU Yu-shen, CHEN Shu-guang, XIU Yan, LI Bei-lei, ZHU Wei-min, YU Hao- jun. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
Abstract:Objective To investigate the added diagnostic value of SPECT/CT imaging over routine planar whole-body bone scintigraphy (WBBS) for bone metastases from lung cancer. Methods One hundred and forty-six patients with lung cancer, confirmed by pathological examination, underwent routine 99Tcm-MDP (1110 MBq) WBBS, followed by SPECT/CT over the regions with indeterminate findings on WBBS. Both WBBS and bone SPECT/CT images were interpreted by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians in consensus as the positive, negative or uncertain bone metastases. The final diagnosis was comfirmed by pathology or clinical follow-up. x2 test was used to compare the differences between the two imaging methods. Results Finally, 45 patients were diagnosed as positive bone metastases and the other 101 as negative. The diagnostic sensitivity of bone SPECT/CT for bone metastases from lung cancer was 93.3%(42/45), singnificantly higher than that of WBBS (64.4%, 29/45) (x2 = 19.944, P<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of bone SPECT/CT was 89.7% ( 131/146), much higher than that of WBBS (44.5%,65/146) ( x2 = 69. 598,P < 0.05). The uncertain and incorrect diagnostic rates of bone SPECT/CT and WBBS were 10.3% ( 15/146, raging from 5.3% to 15.2% with 95% confidence interval (CI) ) and 55.5% (81/146, raging from 47. 4% to 63.5% with95% CI), respectively. Conclusion BoneSPECT/CT provides incremental diagnostic value over routine WBBS for bone metastases from lung cancer.
Keywords:Lung neoplasms  Neoplasm metastasis  Skeleton  Radionuclide imaging  Tomography  emission-computed  single-photoh  Tomography  X-ray computed  MDP
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号